And to me, this is one of the main benefits of hackernews. I don't know everything, I don't know everything available, so I take value from everyone adding the options they know about.
Take VC funding.
I'm being glib, but honestly - it feels like every large vc funded company is actually some many-layered plan to take over existing markets, and then exploit their new monopoly
VCs want unicorns. To get that big you often have to be the biggest in the space or big enough with enough moat to effectively be a monopoly. Monopoly status is the goal
Gumroad seems to me to offer a way to eg sell copies of your pdf. This stripe service seems to be a way to make a link saying “that will be $79.82 please” and collect payment (and maybe some other details).
I.e. Gumroad provides some online store for a single digital product and stripe offer a way to collect money for anything but they don’t handle actually giving you the thing. Obviously there is some overlap but the pitch is different.
Edit: maybe I’m actually wrong and these are really similar. The thing I described above is more like an invoice for which this maybe isn’t suited (pay an invoice once/periodically but these links may be hit many times). So I’m not really sure now
Stripe has a ways to go but certainly can clone these if they wish)
Gumroad is something that should be a 0% fee opensource developer component, not an entire company.
The YC Facebook feed has been depressing lately: $6M funding for one of those links-on-a-page startups, $50M funding for a startup that wants to sell Pokemon cards on a livestream. The VCs are fuelling stagnation by funding these boring inconsequential projects.
Why is YC funding this sort of shit? https://techcrunch.com/2021/05/24/beacons-seed-round-creator...
I do think companies like Airbnb, Dropbox, Stripe, Ginko Bioworks, etc. are doing pretty neat stuff. Even if these businesses don't seem groundbreaking, they clearly are, somehow. But the recent batches of YC startups seem disappointingly... competitive. As in the Thiel-ian sense of not doing much fundamentally different from other players in the market.
I wonder if this could be attributed to Paul Graham stepping back from the front lines.