> If there was a healthier and broader marketplace of forums that people spoke on,

> 99% of all political discourse is concentrated on a single digit number of social media platforms,

let's not blur discourse from the banned candidate/politician with discourse by the population at large.

Any candidate could be banned from Twitter, but that doesn't stop discussion about said candidate on any platform. The candidate can still respond on other platforms and subsequent discussion can still ensue.

I can only guess Florida's motivation on this is but I have a hard time believing that protection from election influence is the primary factor.