Society reifies and adjudicates the specific rules surrounding "property rights", but they also derive from our cultural norms and biological instincts: everything from "Finders Keepers" to "Your Home Is Your Castle". And predictably, these root nodes of moral claims to property frequently conflict.

I strongly recommend Heller & Salzman's "Mine!" [0] as a non-ideological and layperson-accessible exploration of the history and nature of property.

[0] https://www.minethebook.com/

regulating intellectual "property" will only become increasingly difficult to protect and regulate as the technology for recording, copying, and disseminating information improves. In order to regulate intellectual "property", you need to gimp information technology with DRM.

I don't deem the existence of intellectual "property" necessary, in fact I predict its existance will become infeasable to uphold.

I generally agree but it's more accurate to classify "intellectual property" as a completely different concept than "property rights".