>helps fix such interactions by allowing you to send users a specific page that has all the content you want them to read
There are different approaches to pitches, but in my experience, I want the 'blurb'/core pitch pretty high up. I looked at the demo and for me a talking head Is an allergy response, of all the videos/meetings I have to sit through. Some people, I've user-tested this, LOVE to have a talking head screen greet them. So I'm not making a wide statement here. However, I know all user feedback is valuable for a start-up, so I'll go on rambling about my first impressions.
I would want a more website-like experience, such as a clickable menu that makes sense. What I mean is the sections to the right did not show anything that was "attractive": summarizing a positive outcome if I clicked on it.
Again is debatable if this is for the presentation demo or if this has to be addressed through thinking about how the UI and the userUI for building a journey should be more adapted to target user-valuable outcomes.
I would want a chart/mind map overview on the first page and not a full-screen talking head. I can live with 50/50, video and some summary that addresses my needs for pitching, which are: show a capture page that can give the visitor a quick overview of what pain solutions my product has and how it can be used and integrated into their current reality. That way, they will come back to it and share it.
For now, my reaction is: I should check this out, but I would have to spend time, I estimate 20 minutes, to understand it, and my gut reaction is: I don't have mindspace for this right now. THe presentation did not present the value of the product and the idea so that looking at it further would be clearly not painful.
But I think the core pain identified is very real. I have to make a presentation next week and I dread how much mindspace I have to dedicate to it.
Break all their legs!