Here's my complaint. The author is complaining about a big furor over the TOCs, and then proceeds to show us the TOCs that "seems" to be behind it.

Here are the facts:

  * Dropbox released new TOCs.
  * There was a big furor.
  * Dropbox *modified* the TOCs.
  * Furor ended.

Regardless of whether or not, in your opinion, the TOCs were significantly modified, the fact is that:

  * The author presents the modified version of the TOCs.
  * The author claims that the modified version caused the furor.

This is patently false.