The Next Big Thing is Sitting Right in Front of You
cdixon.org
cdixon.org
Might have been a better idea to get him to hire me, but I see no evidence that this went anywhere (by him, anyway)
It all failed miserably. The most epic fail of all was running a campaign to group-buy christmas trees and failing to deliver them before christmas.
A story that's in many ways is just sooo 1999. Here's an article from 2001, after the crash: http://tinyurl.com/6zr3pq8
First you have to recognize that people enjoy doing it and that there is a potential market for the same idea extended elsewhere (in other words you can build one that is better than what already exists). Then you have to both know how to build a website and have the wherewithal to spend hours, days, and weeks, building an initial working version with proper execution.
That's almost like saying to yourself in 1920 that you always recognized people enjoyed getting from one place to another as fast as they could, and while you were contemplating cool business ideas Henry Ford was in a shed building the Model T.
I know it's been said a billion times, but ideas are fucking worthless. There are an infinite number of brilliant businesses in every industry waiting to be built, but unless you are smart enough to build them, you aren't doing anything worthwhile. Just about everything you use every day could be built better, and not just incrementally better, but revolutionarily better in a way that would promote mass-adoption. But simply knowing that isn't enough to build a billion dollar business. It requires genius to have the vision for the starting point of what that product actually looks like in practice and then knowing how to set it into motion.
There is a potentially infinite number of actions one has to do right, in order to succeed with the next big thing. Facebook have had, and still have, some competitors.
It might be that it is actually harder to create a company that way. By definition, the next big thing is not fully understood, what increases the probability of screwing up badly.
And, it's not that obvious whether such model yields the highest returns, to put aside the risk reward equation. We still don't know whether Groupon or Facebook will become long-term profitable companies.
Also, in so fuzzy environment, it's extremely hard to get the timing, and assets, right. The idea of consumer cloud, as syncing the data automatically between many dummy clients, was obvious since 70s, and it actually took enormous efforts from Apple, like iPhone and iPad.
On a much broader perspective, I remain unconvinced that the next big thing is what gives the society the most innovative fruits. The idea of tablet was so cliche everyone gave up, and I'd say that iPad itself is worth much more than the Apple's cloud.
Then Yahoo showed up...
Twenty years ago, I was sitting in front of a 386-SX. Most of the Moore's Law since then has been eaten by the bigger screen and faster net. Isn't it incredible?
Exeter was certainly neither the first nor the only place to have a paper facebook. Harvard, MIT, and most summer camps all had the same thing at that time and years prior.