Then explain your motives more clearly. Freenode used to be managed by a college of trusted people, and now?
The issues with services I speak about wasn't related at all to mail either.
The issues with services I speak about wasn't related at all to mail either.
They were recruited by management.
Let’s not rewrite history any further, please.
As I said in another comment, the core of freenode is its servers and operators, both of whom have no real ties to freenode limited as they consist of sponsored servers and volunteers, respectively. By that nature alone, freenode limited doesn't seem to have any influence over either aside from owning the name and trademarks.
So who exactly is "management" and what role do they have in the freenode network?
Thank you, self-proclaimed saviour of IRC, for your continuing efforts in destroying it. Fortunately money doesn't buy you communities and doesn't buy you people, so compared to some proprietary solutions and companies, we can and will survive. Your freshly acquired toy, on the other hand, probably won't.
How much of your network is actually left standing and operational after what? two days?
Over ten thousand channels have been recreated on the network that is the successor to yours... in one day.
How does that leave you feeling?