The future of war is bizarre and terrifying
noahpinion.substack.com
noahpinion.substack.com
Also, the balance between infantry and horse archers was not as cut and dried as the article indicates but was rather a see-saw. The Roman Army with their heavy infantry legions could defeat heavy cavalry pretty routinely, especially once they figured out logistics. Once Trajan figured out how to love the columns down the Euphrates, the Roman legions destroyed the Parthian horse archers and heavy cavalry and captured the Parthian capital city.
The Chinese infantry, when there was organization, also could destroy horse cavalry. Han and Tang generals did lead armies who were victorious against large nomadic confederations with horse archers.
Even in modern times, air power has limitations in that in can’t actually hold territory, and you need actual boots on the ground.
I think drones are going to be a huge change, but likely in concert with infantry and not as something separate from it. Drones will still have issues of range and control, and perhaps having them based with an infantry unit and working in concert might actually work better than having them alone.
So the future of war is likely to be pretty similar to what it has been for the past millennia: Control the high ground. Use technology to your advantage. Deny the enemy use of territory and resources. Destroy the will of the enemy to fight.
From chariots, to cavalry, to iron weapons, to artillery, to aircraft, to drones, we can still see the pattern of new technology getting incorporated into the military structures.
> Control the high ground. Use technology to your advantage. Deny the enemy use of territory and resources. Destroy the will of the enemy to fight.
Genuine question: how useful is a principle like "deny the enemy the use of territory and resources"? Isn't the devil very much in the details of how one actually goes about this? Pursuing this same goal in two different technological eras will be drastically different in all kinds of ways, and that's the point of the article.
> "use technology to your advantage" is doing a HUGE amount of work, and is the entire subject of the linked article.
My biggest issue with the linked article was it attempting to present a technology as causing a quantum change in military matters. However, militaries have a very long history of adopting new technology into and modifying existing frameworks.
>Genuine question: how useful is a principle like "deny the enemy the use of territory and resources"?
I think this is a very important principle. I feel one of the places where this was forgotten was Vietnam. There was a ton of bombing, and McNamarra, etc made a big deal about the body counts. Vietnam was almost a trial run for "let's win a war just through massive high tech". It turned out to be disaster. Although lots of people were killed and lots of areas deforested, the North Vietnamese were still able to control a lot of territory as use that as the base for the NVA to launch the Tet offensive which massively changed the appetite for continuing the war.
Again a historical perspective might have been helpful. A country that was able to successfully resist Kublai Khan and the Mongol army is going to be pretty hard to successfully invade.
We do know that 'disinformation' runs rampant on the internet and it's becoming increasingly hard and exhausting to find the facts. There are fact-checkers but increasingly they are becoming biased and need to be fact-checked by new fact-checkers. Deepfakes are getting better and better and very soon any video can be fake without it being detectable.
Half of the populating already doesn't trust the media, and the media themselves are thriving by clicks (and thus feed fear and anger). I'm worried where this is leading.
"How is this war different from that war?" "How do we handle attribution?" "How do we monitor pre-emptively and deter?"
Bioterrorism is the big worry -- no other disaster grows, much less at exponential scale.
I wonder if we will ever get to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Taste_of_Armageddon (Original Star Trek series).