Why Should I Care What Color the Bikeshed Is?
freebsd.org
freebsd.org
Incidentally, the article is wrong to date Parkinson's Law to the 1960s. It was very much a creature of the 1950s. That maybe isn't as trivial as it sounds; IIRC the book was part of the wave of post-WWII systems thinking that really got going in the 50s. A lot of that stuff remains pretty interesting. It certainly fed into the cultural explosion that happened later, and was an early sign of disaffection with 50s rigidity, but is a different sort of critique.
ChangeThis solves this problem quite well.
Work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion.
Expenditure rises to meet income.
Expansion means complexity, and complexity decay.
Delay is the deadliest form of denial.
The time spent on any item of a committee's agenda will be in inverse proportion to the sum of money involved. [often short-handed as the "bike shed" problem]
Injelitance: mangers with incompetence mixed with jealousy ruin many organizations.
Or is it just, take simple decisions yourself and try hard to get input on the complex ones?
If you're stuck proposing a bike shed to people you know are going to muck with it, I think you're pretty much stuck. Short of deception, you can't stop them from doing what they want.
All it means is that if you want people to implement your idea in an open source project, send a patch. Ideas don't get the project anywhere, nor does endless discussion. Shut the fuck up and write some code.
It's even on a T-shirt: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2388/2162805091_44ece496b7_m....
Move on, nothing to see, kthxplz.
This is a way of deflecting the client's need to "contribute". If there are other issues with the design those will come up as well, but that initial itch will be lessened.