Excellent to see, the ESC ambiguity problem is one that has especially bugged me.
I hope there's a plan to standardize this with the relevant organizations! I worry that's the only way to see widespread adoption.
I hope there's a plan to standardize this with the relevant organizations! I worry that's the only way to see widespread adoption.
I would hazard to say that some basic subset of VT100 commands is "universally" supported, even on Windows if one uses Windows Terminal.
Various obscure high-end features from 1980s, like programmable font bitmaps, or sixel support, much less so.
Also, modern terminals support Unicode, including emoji (as double-width symbols), which was unimaginable in 1980s or 1990s.
This is also true of the Windows Console as of Windows 10. Any VT100 (also VT220, VT4xx, VT5xx, xterm ...) support we add to Terminal eventually flows out to the console host integrated into Windows. :)
What about non-standard features, like drawing, sixels, sound, mouse, touches, clipboard, fonts, true color, transparent background, color emoji, double size text, etc.?