Superfast-charging aluminum-ion batteries outpower lithium-ion
newatlas.com
newatlas.com
There were literally hundreds of exactly those articles I read or skimmed through in the past, none of them made it to mass market. It's almost as if there might be an underlying scam that produces these research hypes to grab investor money or something. Until the real problems are adressed, or looked at and then the research ceases.
I mean I really hope there are some leaps in battery technology soon, as many do, because it does not hold up at all to moore's law as it is kind of needed for mobile devices to progress as fast as silicon or other advancements. I just don't care for misleading articles anymore :)
This battery addresses those things:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeltaylor/2021/05/13/ev-ran...
https://graphenemg.com/gmg-graphene-aluminium-ion-battery-pe...
On a side note, I don't want to argue over this, but just saying I found two points (compound prices, safety) addressed. It reads kinda like a lot of hype... What do you take from the articles, how this reasearch project is more promising or further down the road then the many promising looking projects before them that ended up failing? You don't see a pattern? This one is now different, how?
PS: To clarify. THIS Article does mention those issues. Others LIKE these often don't.
Think of it this way: no passenger car EV today can make full use of a 350 kW CCS charger. If this battery can enable a flat charging curve at 350 kW, then it would only take 17 minutes to charge a 100 kWh battery from 0 to 100% state of charge.
Ironically it also points out this would like cause demand for fossil fuel peakers, making the car far less green.