Why hardly anyone buys Google's Pixel phones

Can't speak for Pixel, but I had two Google Nexus phones that both got stuck in the Bootloop of Death state (you can't start the phone even with reboot tricks, it gets stuck in a boot state), and I heard of several other people (including coworkers) that had the same issues, so it turned me off buying Google phones in general, and I never even considered buying any Pixel phones because of it. Really liked my Nexus phones up until that point, though.

https://hackaday.com/2017/03/21/fix-a-brick-fighting-the-nex...

I own Pixel 2XL (released in 2017). It has an amazing camera which can compete with any modern phone camera, great battery life, no bloatware, excellent performance. Best phone a ever had - really zero issues. Not only I wouldn't switch to other OEM, I can't even find a good reason to upgrade.

I recently upgraded to a Pixel 4a from an iPhone SE and it's convinced me that, in fact, Google is really good with software when they have the opportunity to program directed against a set SKU. Performance is really good on the device, it's functional and doesn't get in your way.

As for the article, TBH, I think the Pixel devices don't do well because of aesthetics of their phones. This is something that Apple does really well.

Take a look at the recent leaked photos of the Pixel 6. IMO, it looks.. not so great. I'm not surprised that people choose iPhone over Pixel, especially with the iMessage effect, longevity of the devices and overall design.

The Pixel 4a is probably the best phone I've had. Google could have something really great if they actually stick with it for the long-term.

I just bought a Pixel 4a -- so I could put Graphene OS on it. I don't presume the Graphene fan club is responsible for anything beyond a small percentage of the Pixel sales but Graphene does require a Pixel handset (at least for now).

Google knows all this. I figured they're keeping the skeleton of a flagship, branding, marketing, and distribution as a countervailing threat to oems like Samsung that have played around with Tizen or thinking of going too propietary. If an OEM decides to drop play services or the play store then all google has to do is dump some money into their pixel org to make things move a little bigger and faster. Plus it helps to have a flagship when you're developing new Android features. Telephony features and dual sim was supported by pixels first, at least in a non hacky way

I love my pixel 4a. Got it for $300 USD and it does all i need it to. (Calls, text, web browsing).

Best of all: no 3rd party bloatware.

I have a Pixel 3 after using Galaxy's and Notes for over a decade. It's by far the best phone I've had.

It's rugged (dropped it many times, gotten it wet, used it in machine shop environments daily), fast, and the battery life is truely awesome.

I've never filled up the internal storage (I don't take huge amounts of pictures or video, but I do sync and upload all of it to my computer every time I connect to my wifi).

The best thing though, is that after almost 3 years of hard use, it hasn't become sluggish or unreliable, a hallmark of Samsung devices.

Google doesn't really want to have a big market share in the Android ecosystem. If Google achieved that it would almost instantly be under anti-trust suspicion from the DOJ.

What Google does want is to provide provide clean excellent phones where the advertising budget is reduced and the money saved goes right into the quality of the phones.

Having said all that I've had a few Pixels and what I appreciate most is the low light performance of the cameras. I happen to be fond of this kind of photography and so it really works for me.

What I don't appreciate is having to disable both third party cookies in the Android Chrome browser and location tracking. These are both very creepy data scrappers that Google turns right around and sells to advertisers. No thank you.

Next phone though I'm likely to go with Apple just because they are much more privacy forward that Google. I don't appreciate Apple's walled garden approach and therefore I don't have any other Apple products but a standalone Apple phone will meet my needs.

Lack of advertising is probably the main reason. I have had a few Nexus and Pixel phones and they've all been excellent.

I really like my Pixel 3XL. Most prominently I like the fact that it's running stock Android and gets updates quickly. On my prior phones, updates had to go through both the manufacturer AND Verizon before they'd update, which could be months or even years, especially as the device aged.

I'm sure I could get that by maintaining it myself, but I don't want to. I don't want my phone to be a job; I do enough debugging at work.

That probably means I should switch over to the iPhone, since the price and features are comparable. But I'm OK with being a slave to the Google ecosystem rather than the Apple ecosystem -- whichever one lets me most easily forget that there's an ecosystem at all and just use the device.

For me it's the lack of a micro SD port. How can you have a more expensive product with the same stuff as lesser expensive products but eliminate that one feature that is exactly why people don't buy apple phones?

When the Pixel 1 first launched in 2016, I saw no shortage of TV advertisements for it. Google made a big deal about the Pixel's camera being the singular focus of its R&D efforts and as a result, it was a cut above that of the competition. The name "Pixel" emphasized its picture quality. But as usual, Google seems to have lost focus instead of pressing its advantage. The Pixel 3 (which I own) was the last iteration that offered definite improvements over its predecessor; recent releases have been treading water at best.

I stopped buying the pixel the moment they stopped producing the XL version. Perhaps the data showed there weren't a lot of XL buyers but I was one of them and upgraded nearly every year.