Or, you know, anarchy. Current lack of a permanent winner does not imply that no one is playing the game.
I'm not sure that anarchism can be as stable as government, but I think it's certainly possible. In any case, history doesn't appear to show that there's any system which is stable in the long term -- the Roman Republic didn't remain one. Considering only longevity and stability, monarchy may be the standout government type.
I'm not sure you get the original concept concept of anarchy. Anarchy is a society mode where there is no designed leader that has power over everyone and where law is substituted by social standard that people follow (no written rule). It's basically NOT having a government.
your free to think anything you want, but with no empirical data or any substantial evidence to support your opinion...why share them here?
It is by definition not an anarchy.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy#Lists_of_ungoverned_com...