It's a highly emotional and speculative post about how short selling should be banned because of a slim chance that "immuno-oncology" research could have received more funding.
Example #4,889,012 of how shareholders ruin everything
But they're literally not shareholders? If anything they're the opposite of shareholders.
If it weren’t for shareholders, the company wouldn’t even exist. Who do you think kicked in the initial capital for the company to get started?
beware that superstonk is a fishy sub that spawned out of nothing after the worst fringe element of wallstreetbets got the boot.