There are some absolute gems on the list, don't get me wrong-- but if your goal is to read 100 good books you haven't read before, you could do a lot better. (And I say this as someone who has read 90 of the 100 titles listed.)
There are some absolute gems on the list, don't get me wrong-- but if your goal is to read 100 good books you haven't read before, you could do a lot better. (And I say this as someone who has read 90 of the 100 titles listed.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_100_Best_Books_of_All_Time
You'll notice that it's much less heavily biased toward 20th Century English-language literature.
If you want to stick to things originally written in English, the Modern Library list is a pretty good one:
http://www.modernlibrary.com/top-100/100-best-novels/
I mean "The Board's List", of course--comparing "The Board's List" to the "The Reader's List" is enough to make one cry.
http://www.hcpl.net/read/phobos-100-best-science-fiction-boo...
Check out their Five Books interviews, always good reads and great interviews :)
But that's okay. My goal isn't to read one hundred books I'll really like, it's to complete an arbitrary set of tasks. If all of the books are enjoyable then there's no sense of achievement when I get to the end. I figure that whatever happens, I'll know a lot more when I finish than when I started. (Do you know what "Timon of Athens" is like? I sure as hell don't...)
You'll definitely end up knowing a lot more when you finish than when you started, but I doubt that "Bridget Jones Diary" or a half-dozen separate works of Thomas Hardy are going to contribute much to that achievement.