Good thing CPI isn’t calculated using anecdotal evidence from “anyone who has been to the supermarket”.
Learn more about the calculation here: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/cpi_04132021.htm
Learn more about the calculation here: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/cpi_04132021.htm
If you think it is a fair indication, I have a bridge to sell to you
Whether you think it and it’s constituent parts are good metric for measuring inflation is a different conversation. But that doesn’t make it “rigged”.
I don’t get how anecdotal evidence trumps repeatedly buying and measuring the cost of a vast cross section of products everyday people consume?
Help me understand the conspiracy here? Who is doing the rigging and how?
You don’t print $10T and handwave away millennia of basic economic principles.
Help me understand how CPI is not a joke with respect to how it’s used to say “this is normal.”
Everything I’m interested in spending money on, new hires for my company, real estate, cars, computer hardware, food, lumber, gas. All of this is coincidentally more expensive sometimes by a factor of more than 2x from two years ago? Nope, not buying it.
You can look at what is measured in CPI and how it’s measured. You can have a conversation about whether that’s the most precise way to measure inflation etc. but just waving your hands about your “lived experience” and making allusions to a conspiratorial “they” doesn’t pass for analysis.
Show your work. What is the motive here for the “Fed and U.S. government are rigging our economic system to backdoor tax the middle class while gaslighting all of us into thinking that this is normal”? How do they do it? What’s in it for them? I’m genuinely curious how you get there from looking at CPI.
There's a huge monetary incentive, since things like social security payments (the largest item in the federal budget) are inflation indexed. The Boskin Report [1], which argued that inflation was overstated by 1.1%, estimated that their proposed "corrections" would reduce the deficit by $202 billion by 2008.
The whole thing was rather suspicious in my opinion. The report was based on some questionable interpretations of inflation, and it seemed like the Senate appointed particular members in order to get the outcome they wanted, as Thomas Palley argued [2]:
> The commission is itself a delicious example of such bias: All its members were on record prior to the establishment of the commission as believing the CPI to be overstated. At the same time, the commission took no evidence from such well-known economists as Janet Norwood, a former head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and Dean Baker, of the Economic Policy Institute, who believe that the CPI provides a reasonable reading of inflation. In effect, the commission took account of all the evidence of overstatement of inflation by the CPI and downplayed the evidence of potential understatement.
[1] https://www.ssa.gov/history/reports/boskinrpt.html
[2] https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1997/04/how-to-...
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-fed-dudley-ipad-idUST...
Well, yeah. Nobody is trying to hide this fact.
> gas
https://www.gasbuddy.com/charts
> food
Check the BLS data. In the short term, some food is def up, but less than 5%
Over the long term, it's down.
> cars
Down over the long term. Up in the last year.
> computer hardware
Yeah new hardware is gonna be expensive due to that whole chip shortage thing
> lumber
lol yeah all that lumber you're spending your money on
The only thing that's up by a factor of 2x is lumber, and I'm gonna bet that's only on your list because of all the headlines it's making.