For those who can afford it, quitting has become the ultimate form of self-care
thecut.com
thecut.com
At some point some people come to a breaking point... what used to be known as a "nervous breakdown". I think of it as a progressive paralysis, a psychological (not physical) inability to continue.
The lucky ones can "just snap out of it", take a break and come back refreshed, or switch jobs and everything's ok again.. or at least bearable.
For the rest of us, it's not so easy. Yet, paradoxically, and this can be a source of tremendous guilt, "getting over it" should be the easiest thing in the world.
"You just..." fill in the blank.. pick up the phone, dial the number, take a shower, brush your teeth, get out of bed, put on your clothes, go to work, do what you know how to do and what you've been doing for X number of years all along, deal with your colleagues, deal with your boss, eat your lunch, eat your dinner, go back to sleep, wake up for another day, rinse and repeat day in and day out again and again...
Some can manage it, but for some it gets to be too much.. simple things, such simple things... most can do it, their whole lives, they just do it, why can't we?
This whole comment, but especially this part, speaks to me. Thank you.
- What precisely constitutes a burnout?
- How do you objectively differentiate between a challenging situation and over-stressed situation leading to burnout?
- What are the differences in tolerance for stressful situation from person to person? Is it related to certain personalities?
- How to conduct a self-analysis to determine if you're going through a burnout?
- Do other non-software professions go through burnout? Alternatively, is software engineering more prone to burnout?
I've always heard of burnout, but like depression which has specific symptoms and clinical diagnosis, what are the properties, symptoms and characteristics of a burnout?
I am wondering if I am going through one? I like what you said about guilt - I feel like I've gone through hell in workplaces and always curious if I should just "suck-it-in" or quit and find a better job.
You know you're burned out when things that used to motivate you to get up early and work through lunch now feel like burdens. Not just work stuff either, but burnout it starts affecting your life outside work, on things that you thought had nothing to do with work.
> a challenging situation
You're challenged when, even if you don't know how to get through it, you have in your mind a structure, a way of getting through it. You know you can figure it out, you just have to work it out, and the process of working through it energizes you. You're over-stressed when you don't see a way through, or when you see the way through but dread doing the necessary things.
Tolerance for stress depends, in part, on a person's level of resilience: your ability to face reality exactly as it is, your sense that what you do will have some meaningful impact, and your self-confidence in your ability to handle the situation. You might remember a time when you were a kid and something you dealt with seemed like the end of the world, but now you look back and wonder what the big deal was. Your ability to manage stressful situations grew.
In short, when you're burnt out, you're tired even when you get enough sleep, you are reflexively cynical and critical of the work, and you begin to feel like problems you should be able to handle require extraordinary efforts. Those feelings happen now and then when you're not burnt out, but if it becomes chronic, that's burnout.
Oooooh boy you should look into medicine. This is a profession that has been dealing with insane burnout since before software existed and is only recently getting any amount of attention from within the community. (Think 80+ hour surgical residency for 8 years with the self-perpetuating cycle of "that's what I had to do so I make these residents do it too" logic of hazing)
I was previously pre-med and at one of my med school interviews (when the school was bragging about their mental health resources) they mentioned a story of a physician who played candy crush every morning before he got out of bed "just so that he could have one win for the day."
For me, I knew I was burned out when I just could not face the thought of going into the office and doing my job any longer. It made me physically sick to my stomach and then, over time, started to manifest itself in other ways that negatively affected my physical health.
The linked article really spoke to me - as do a lot of the comments in this thread. I think that for those who burn out, the hardest thing is perhaps learning to forgive yourself. Sounds cliched but there it is.
Like literally dropped my notice yesterday. Cashed out a bunch of stock last week -- good timing, cuz shit is fallin this week! -- and already looking at grad school and cert programs.
The main reason I know it was a burnout is that I never really found back. I am done with tech, or rather done with 40 hour weeks, done with unrealistic deadlines, done with so many things actually.
The Maslach Burnout Inventory, mentioned in TFA, is probably the most widely used/recognised specific classification / diagnostic mechanism.
If you think you're experiencing burnout, my recommendation would be to seek mental health support and specifically request the burnout assessment. Getting that might be more difficult than you'd expect, the sector is often averse to making such determinations.
After all this whole concept of spending a career at someone else's company only started in the late 20th C when the industrial rev created the modern corporation.
Psh, what preceded that was far worse and also involved a lifetime of laboring for someone else's benefit.
The yeoman artisan period has always been more myth than reality.
My take on this is that there's some part of our minds that knows we don't have to be servants to our companies. And knowing that, yet subjugating ourselves anyway creates an itch. That itch grows a little every day we wake up to an alarm and haul ourselves into the office for useless meetings. We know deep down this isn't an acceptable road for our lives. But we're here anyway, with a story that somehow justifies closing jira tickets - day in, day out.
Coincidentally, depression is an evolved mechanism for stopping you from doing something that you know deep down is unhealthy for your soul but habitual. It works by every day making it harder to do the thing you know you shouldn't do. The longer you resist it, the deeper depression burrows, until you finally can't bring yourself to make pleasantries with your spouse - or, in this case, haul yourself into the office.
For my money, burnout is a depression symptom which grows out of a long term, habitual suppression of your will. "I want X, but I can't have it because of <habitual rationalisation>". After growing up being told we can do anything, we aren't adapted for existence as a few pixels in a giant org chart. Burnout is a healthy backstop to force you to pursue the life you need, even if each day you can convince yourself you don't want it.
I was only responding to the implicit claim of the grand parent.
FWIW, I think "that's how it always has been" has no impact on the morality of something, so I am inclined to agree with you.
But we don't need to paint a rosy picture of a lost past to critique the status quo.
Mid- and post-industrial revolution Europe had many large companies with many employees. In fact, the British East India Company (founded in the year 1600) was the first company to sell shares of ownership to raise enough capital to buy/build the necessary supplies to do large-scale business (in their case, mostly ship construction).
Of course, modern labor laws were created in response to the horrible human rights abuses committed by business owners against their employees beginning at that time.
The opposition of "big capital" vs "labor" (and hence the philosophy built on that dichotomy that underpins Marxism) didn't really exist prior to these large industrial revolution companies.
Prior to that, small businesses (and banks/lenders) were the bread and butter of economic society.
Luckily Marxism hasn't really been taken seriously by economists since it couldn't resolve it's main tenant (labour theory of value) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformation_problem
The nice thing about working for someone else's company is you work 40 hours, then it leaves your mind for the rest of the time. If there's some problem at work, it's usually "not in my job description." Like, printer doesn't work? Call the Department of Inhuman Resources. Not your problem.
If you work for yourself, it's 24/7. No vacations, either. All problems are your problem. Printer quit? Whatcha gonna do about it? It isn't for everyone.
I'm not saying we should go back to being one problem away from death, but also solving problems that just fundamentally don't matter to us personally doesn't seem to be great either.
But working for someone else - payroll was not my department.
But a 24/7 stress of self-employment is not for the faint of heart either. What's the compromise?
Such places don't exist forever, and they don't tend to be massive growth situations. But they are probably what many people yearn for.
If only most people realized that :-)
Picture changes drastically if you have an abusive boss or a toxic work culture. There have to be a bunch of people on HN who physically cringed when they saw 40 hours, some have even talked themselves into being macho about it.
I'm one of them.
What in modern society (or even this website) makes you think it's only 40 hours?
Or that you can just go "not my problem boss" -- in an At Will state that can literally get you fired on the spot.
> If you work for yourself, it's 24/7. No vacations, either. All problems are your problem. Printer quit? Whatcha gonna do about it? It isn't for everyone.
Bullocks. You set the hours as a contractor -- literally, in the contact. This is standard freelance stuff.
The jobs I've held for the entirety of my so-far 8 year career, where I can count on my hands the number of times I've worked more than 40 hours in a week.
> Or that you can just go "not my problem boss" -- in an At Will state that can literally get you fired on the spot.
The fact that I've done that, many times, and not gotten fired. If you are skilled and a good performer, you have a lot of leverage, doubly so in the current job market.
> Bullocks. You set the hours as a contractor -- literally, in the contact. This is standard freelance stuff.
What happens when a client decides not to pay you? What happens when you can't find enough work to make whatever amount you want to make? How do you establish a reliable client base that won't saddle you with those first 2 problems in the first place? That's just the tip of the iceberg of problems you'll have to deal with on your own if you go the freelance route, which a salaried job will abstract away from you. Not everyone wants to deal with those issues; I certainly don't.
Rush hour times makes it pretty obvious. Another thing is I've worked as both employer and employee. People leave after 8 hours.
> You set the hours as a contractor -- literally, in the contact.
Your 40 hour employee contract says 40 hours, literally. Why are you able to stand up for yourself as a contractor (who can be shown the door any second) but not as an employee?
> in an At Will state that can literally get you fired on the spot
Only if they are looking for an excuse to get rid of you anyway. And contractors are easy to fire on the spot, there are no legal restrictions on that.
Also, if you're a contractor, you spend a lot of time looking for contracts. 24/7.
“…man never regards what he possesses as so much his own, as what he does; and the labourer who tends a garden is perhaps in a truer sense its owner, than the listless voluptuary who enjoys its fruits…In view of this consideration, it seems as if all peasants and craftsman might be elevated into artists; that is, men who love their labour for its own sake, improve it by their own plastic genius and inventive skill, and thereby cultivate their intellect, ennoble their character, and exalt and refine their pleasures. And so humanity would be ennobled by the very things which now, though beautiful in themselves, so often serve to degrade it…But, still, freedom is undoubtedly the indispensable condition, without which even the pursuits most congenial to individual human nature, can never succeed in producing such salutary influences. Whatever does not spring from a man’s free choice, or is only the result of instruction and guidance, does not enter into his very being, but remains alien to his true nature; he does not perform it with truly human energies, but merely with mechanical exactness…
…we may admire what he does, but we despise what he is.” ― Wilhelm von Humboldt
You weren’t beholden to someone else’s corporation, but you were to someone else’s land or tribe/community.
1) "nervous breakdown"
2) "just snap out of it",
3) "getting over it"
4) "You just..."
I see people doing that as taking control. We are the strong ones. We are the ones who reject the vile life that is corporate cubicles.
People who seem to be able to tolerate it have in reality just given up. They are reduced to accepting the grey cubicle and unchanging life that is working in an office.
Sure, there are some shining lights and people that thrive. But the majority of people in offices are beaten down and just trying to stay anonymous and survive.
A nervous breakdown is going on the offensive! It's screaming no more! It's taking back your life in a burst of energy that leaves you exhausted and takes time to recover from. But when you do recover, and you will, you come out better and wiser than before.
I guard my mental health like the Crown Jewels now and really try not to do anything I don't want to do!
There are a (probably) minority of people with genuine brain chemistry imbalances, genetic or otherwise, that cause depression. But for the vast, vast majority of people being fed pills and trying to ignore their problems, your mental health issues are signs of issues you need to deal with, unresolved traumas, unfulfilling work, love, family, or social situations, political problems that you can't accept but you won't engage with, and so on.
I’m sorry, but this triggered me. Have you tried an open office? I long for my cubicles.
At least then I had like 4 square meters to myself. Both my space and my privacy have been degraded more and more.
Actually I lumped in cubicles with open offices as being the same thing.
I've worked in both!
I'll try to be careful with my words here:
So I found no difference in my actual happiness or well being such.
I do agree that having a 'home' in an office is important - and a cubicle you can call your own and decorate is something...
Totally agree that open plan noisy offices are a nightmare!
Hot-desking is another level of hell again!
All things considered I dont have poisitve views of any office situation based on my now >25years of experience! (damn, has it been that long...)
But I appreciate that some people do.
So thats just me :-)
These days I get to work from my home office with my wife and it's great! :-)
Having thrown off multiple jobs that tried to reduce me to mindless peon, I find that the attempt to force me into their paradigm is explosive and will only explode more in the future. Via me, or the countless others who see, agree, and comment on this and other threads like it. Revolutions don't have to be noisy :)
The best office I’ve had was one where we had a real room for every 4 people or so (and 20+sqm per room).
I HATED curry days at the canteen.
Then Covid came along and could work from home but then I should have known better when they installed MS Teams and we had longer useless meetings now with fading cheapskate Bob that uses his Nokia headphones as a headset with his barking dog as background noise.
Because there's more to life than personal happiness. Struggle is the definition of life. It's what gives anything meaning. People have families that they support, and being that thankless workhorse for them ends up being a deeper satisfaction than personal moment to moment happiness. We could all go sit in cabins in the woods and whittle away on sticks until we die and probably be "happier". But if a tree falls in the forest with no one around, does it make a sound? That is to say, does a person in isolation enjoying their own happiness have any meaning whatsoever?
There are some things worth struggling against, but I see no better reason to quit than a pointless struggle.
Does grinding oneself into dust at a thankless job for a faceless corporation in the name of perpetual economic "growth" at the cost of the entirety of survivable nature as we know it have any meaning whatsoever? Because that's the flipside of what you're saying.
It may not be possible for us to go back to a time before modern technology, medicine, etc (or maybe its more likely than we think), but is it any wonder that so many peoples' brains yearn for something like that? The definition of life may be struggle, as you say, but struggle without self-determination may be the very thing that kills whatever "human" is.
jk, but seriously, meaning is subjective, and nihilism is a thing. one mans isolation may mean worlds to him, and thats good enough.
also, careful about shaming people for being content with personal happiness...for some thats an accomplishment.
But everyone is discounting struggling for faceless corporate entities that do not and will never give a shit about you.
After a year long pandemic where people thought about life a lot and spent time alone, even a job that isn't a white shoe finance law firm or a vicious finance company or mean startup where people sleep under their desks - even a 9-6 or whatever, with a nice boss, can have the symptoms just as described in the comments below. Indifference, unrefreshed sleep, easily stressed by small things, unmotivated outside of work and within it... cynical. A feeling of meaninglessness inside and outside work. Small problems become exasperating annoyances. Too fuzzy-brained to even plan a vacation or decide which bed to buy. Stagnation.
Or so I'm told.
What in the world causes this? Boredom? Routine? We speak of the stresses that cause burnout (abso-fucking-lutely) but what about the dull routines, the blah-ness of being on a treadmill and staring at the distance ticking. A lack of meaning? This happens to people with families and children, too.
I'd love to hear some subjective experiences of the "non-stressed-as-much-but-still-burnt-out" burnout victims. Add to it the guilt.
Unfreedom.
Also, not really sympathetic. Some of these people deserve the misery
Outside of a penal institution, your freedom is limited by a multitude of varying affordances: behavioral nudges, implicit value judgements, unstated social conventions, and so on, which automatically limit your behavioral options. Many of these pressures contradict each other, and handling the cognitive dissonance every waking moment can slowly add up to decision fatigue.
So it is very easy to end up chasing whatever you sincerely believe to be "success", yet do it unnaturally and in spite of yourself. To compare with the prison example: it's very easy to get stuck in a situation where there is no obvious "enemy" who's keeping your stuck, and no obvious reason things are like this besides "they randomly ended up like this". And you can keep doing this for longer than the whatever the average prison term is, because you don't realize your idea of "success" is not really yours at all, it's a label you put on an unstable compromise with the totality of your being.
This is your brain on misaligned incentives. If you've ended up in such a situation, you're also probably in an environment that censures the kind of thinking required to realign them, and which offers no support with the work involved in getting out of the trap. So it's also very easy to start feeling like there's something wrong with you in particular, and slip into more chronic forms of burnout, depression, and more or less permanent mental dysfunction.
It's especially bad when a society runs on unresolved internal contradictions for a few generations - everyone's burnout adds up to a form of pervasive malaise, and the reactions can be quite brutal and senseless. Germany in the 1930s Germany or Russia in the 1990s Russia come to mind - historical periods whose horrors are usually downplayed in favor of romanticizing the struggle for survival in a society which offers no hope for a good life.
It can be draining. IMHO that's one reason why religions, ideologies, conspiracy theories, pyramid schemes, and other arbitrary value systems (including the monetary one!) manage to motivate people so well, regardless of having no ultimate basis in physical reality. They offer you a chance to extinguish all your self-doubts and replacing innumerable fickle sensors with a single value scale, so instead of suffering impostor syndrome and burnout, you end up happily believing that you're always right, and blind to any actual harm you might be causing.
So if you're currently having your brain fried by the world, remember that it's not your fault, and please do whatever it takes to resist and get yourself back to the clarity of a healthy mental state - even if that means letting go more preconceptions than you're comfortable with.
Do the crime, do the time? In the modern office it's, do the time, or don't pay the bills on time.
Another way to say it would be that I think it's about the job not aligning with people's intrinsic motivators. Doesn't necessarily require the job to be at all stressful.
When people don't have enough of those things, they get burnout. Some people get them from other parts of their lives, so they're unphased by lacking them at work as long as they make "enough" money. Some people just need less than others, for a variety of reasons.
My last day at my current job is Friday, after nearly nine years. I'm not leaving because of burnout, but because I no longer need the job (right now -- it's not like I never need to work again) and it's no longer rewarding in non-financial ways day to day.
While my time will be very lightly scheduled and contain almost nothing that looks like work, I do have goals for my time off and a rough timeline for when I'd like to return to work. Those goals would be very difficult to achieve (for me, not necessarily for others) while also working full time. I am the perfect example of someone quitting as an act of self care.
Do you worry at all about how that will impact your ability to retire? The drain on your savings?
Being in the right mental place to do that is part of why now is the right time.
Many professors are of course still motivated by internal drive, but there aren't strong external controls that can be exerted.
While I realize this isn't an option for many people due to lack of opportunities, kids, lifestyle creep, etc., I have both planned for it and been very fortunate. So no, I'm not worried about it.
So you made well above that for 9 years AND lived somewhere with a lower cost of living?
Then I could understand saving so much that you don't worry about retirement. But if you're making "good" but average salary in the bay area, and even saving a lot, you're still eating into savings to take months and years off.
Maybe an easier way to ask this is... What would you consider to be enough saved in the bank, at say, 35 years old, to take a whole year off?
A senior dev in the Bay Area working at a respectable company will get 300k per year minimum.
300k+ for 9 years will put you solidly into the 7 figures of net worth - especially if you invest well in the last decade.
I figured that the average senior engineer in California makes somewhere between $130,000 and $170,000, depending on region.
I had simply no idea that an average senior engineer could be making north of $300,000. That is jaw dropping and of course I understand now how you're able to take time off.
I save over 50% of my income but I don't make anything close to $300,000 so yea, taking a whole year off would be a big chunk of my savings.
I guess I need to try and find a job where I'm making $300,000 lol. Do you have some niche specialty or is that literally just a standard rate?
There is something wrong with this piece of information. If you really save 50%, then taking a whole year off will only wipe out one year of savings, no matter what you make. So if it's a large part of your savings and you're really saving 50%, then the problem is you've only been saving for a couple of years. Having a higher income just makes it easier to have a higher savings rate, it doesn't change the math on how many years you have to save to afford the time off, given equal savings rates. You might want to re-read my other comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27126783
> I guess I need to try and find a job where I'm making $300,000 lol. Do you have some niche specialty or is that literally just a standard rate?
It's a standard rate for someone who was a senior engineer then got promoted two more times, I guess. I don't have a niche specialty. And I expect to (and have planned for) making less at my next job, and potentially for the rest of my career.
I could be wrong but, I don't think that's standard pay for the vast majority of software jobs in the bay area, whether it be at smaller startups or more old school traditional software companies.
As I said in my original post, I've been very fortunate, and my situation doesn't apply to everyone even in tech. But yes, though I started out lower than that at the beginning, it just grew rapidly over time. This is the pay grade I've been at for the last several years: https://www.levels.fyi/company/PayPal/salaries/Software-Engi... (3rd party source, not implying anything about its accuracy)
> Then I could understand saving so much that you don't worry about retirement. But if you're making "good" but average salary in the bay area, and even saving a lot, you're still eating into savings to take months and years off.
I'm going to ignore compound interest and taxes for simplicity here. If I save 50% of my salary, and take one year off, I lose two years of savings -- one year of spending and one year of making up for what I spent. If I save 10% of my salary, and take one year off, I lose ten years of savings -- one year of spending and nine years making up for what I spent.
> Maybe an easier way to ask this is... What would you consider to be enough saved in the bank, at say, 35 years old, to take a whole year off?
This part of the answer is actually terrible advice because it's so over-simplified, this is just meant to make a point. The shorthand rule is at a 50% savings rate you can retire after a 20 year career. So you don't really need to have anything saved at 35 beyond what you'll spend to take time off, because when you come back you'll still have more than 20 years left to work.
Keeping my savings rate high is fundamentally what allows me to do this, more because I'll make up for the "lost time" quickly than because of what I've already saved.
I lived very cheaply, worked a few freelance jobs, burned through my savings, and ended up finding a job when I had about 6 months of expenses left in my savings account. Never had to dip into retirement or stocks though.
Best time of my life. Many people like the sound of this but have no interest in actually living that way. I lived in a tiny studio apartment, rode a bicycle everywhere, ate a cheap plant based diet, and bought almost nothing.
Personally, I liked having a routine and would make a little checklist at the start of every week that I had to do everyday. I remember stuff on it being like:
1. Say hello to someone I don’t already know.
2. Brush 2x and floss.
3. Walk for 1 hour after dinner.
I ended up doing some 500 sit-up program and within a year was doing like 5000 crunches a week. I also said yes to everything I was offered and wouldn’t worry about money too much. If a friend was going to a $5 concert, I could drop everything and go.
I have a lot of good memories from that time. It was amazing to just feel completely free.
This may be a difference in perspective but, I consider my savings and my official 401k to both be "retirement".
Partly this is because, I only have a 401k from a previous company. My current employer doesn't have one, so any savings I have are my "retirement".
I'm not going to be able to retire, and my savings are gone. The end of my life is likely to be quite miserable.
I know my choices have lead to that. They weren't good choices, and I wouldn't recommend them to anyone. But they are the choices I made and I am reaping the consequences.
If you can hack it, be all career oriented and make good choices that secure your future... more power to you if you can do that for yourself and your family.
My wife took a 6 month unpaid sabbatical about a year after we moved in together. She had been with the same company for 10 years at that point. She saved up about four months worth of rent and we just stopped eating out as much, and she paid for the rest with a ~4% personal loan through her local credit union. I think it was paid off within three months.
More recently, my wife took off 1 month unpaid maternity leave. During pregnancy we both saved about 10% of our disposable income, and this more than covered her portion of the living expenses during this month.
So, in the five years I've known my wife, she's taken 7 months unpaid leave. That's not a huge amount of time, but at the same time, definitely helped her avoid burnout. And we didn't have to chip in to long term savings for her to do it. I work in a different industry and job hop more often, so I just take 3 weeks unpaid in-between jobs, which is a mild strain on finances, but not significant. Other than the mortgage and boat payment we don't carry any long term debt and continue to save for retirement.
As for future plans, in about five years we're planning on taking an unpaid year off, just before our kids go to primary school, but plan on doing that in a low cost of living area. Most of that year will be paid for using savings set aside for that, with any run-over paid for with low interest loans. Will it impact the long tail of my retirement? Probably to some degree, but I'd rather spend my time, now, with my kids, rather than rot away in a retirement home wishing I hadn't worked so much.
So after these 10 years you’re free to quit working for ever, work as little as you feel, and for any amount of money. In other words: you’re free to do whatever you want.
((((((((50*1.07+50)*1.07 + 50)*1.07 + 50)*1.07 + 50)*1.07 + 50)*1.07 + 50)*1.07 + 50)*1.07 + 50)*1.07 + 50)*1.07*0.04 = 30,000 per year income, after saving 50,000 per year and making 7% for 10 years at a 4% withdrawal rate, which is very aggressive for a retirement longer than the standard 30 years.
((((((((((((((((((50*1.06+50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06 + 50)*1.06*0.026 = 50,000 per year income, after saving 50,000 per year and making 6% for 20 years at a 2.6% withdrawal rate, which should be relatively safe even for a very long retirement.
50% of a McDonalds burger flipper salary while a large percentage of their salary, is still a very small amount of money.
Where does this logic of 50% for 20 years come from? Seems like a serious broad "rule of thumb" kind of thing that is only just barely realistic?
It doesn't matter your actual salary, if you can get by on 35% of it and save the other 65% then it's all that matters. After you've saved for 10-11 years, you'll get the 35% of your original salary you live on, in perpetuity, from what you saved earlier.
Now of course it's much easier to save 65% when you're paid more than if you're paid minimum wage, but still. And you'll probably want some slack because these numbers are really the bare minimum, but that's the idea. Saving 65% of your income as a SE is really not that hard for a lot of us, even less so when you realize this is the ticket to being free within 10-15 years.
I wasn't burned out. I liked my job and my work. It wasn't the most consequential work, I was writing code for some product I didn't really believe in, but I enjoyed it. But my boss was insufferable. I think he was bipolar or something. So one day after the 100th time of toying with me to prove to himself who's in charge, I just quit, right there, on the spot, turned in my security keys to the building and left. I wasn't planning on it, I just realized that this man is never going to just let me contribute what I have to offer and enjoy my job and it was not going to get better, so I was not going to give him one more second of my life.
I have worked an odd job or two since and did a little bit of freelance coding. I've drifted quite a bit. It gets boring, but I am also much more at ease. I want to do something but I need to call my own shots. I have built some skills and hobbies I have wanted to build in my free time, and I have found my minimum lifestyle that I am happy with, there are a few ways I want to try to reduce further, and also I have put off lots of things I thought I wanted to do, and things I still think I want to do, but I think I'll figure out how to do them or whether I really want to eventually.
They cost about the same per month as living in a city and going to work, so it's really not a big deal, financially.
I do some freelance writing for magazines, I've written a few books, I do speaking engagements. I have less money than when I was slinging code, and I'm about 9000 times happier and can hardly remember work stress as a thing.
I'm just about to set off on my next major expedition, and at age 39 I couldn't be happier I decided to quit the rate race when I did! I wouldn't go back for all the money in the world.
Also, what was your most memorable place you've seen in the Americas? Africa?
My long term plan going forward is that I'll likely stay at a "home base" for a year or three so I can have all those things you mention, then hit the road for a year or so before coming back to that same home base.
It's a tough thing to balance, but on the whole I know I wouldn't be happy if i just stayed in one place indefinitely.
Edit: This reminds me of the concept of "social integration" in sociology. Some works of fiction cast it as "conformity".
What do you do for money though? I know you mentioned odd job or two but my biggest concern is long term sustainability. Surely one needs to pay the bills somehow after the honeymoon period is over.
I don't live in a city. I doubt I ever will again. There's nothing there for human beings, they're hostile to us, they're sirens on sharp rocks.
I have been unemployed for 5 months. It isn't any better now. I am trying to work from home on some side projects but I am able to focus for about one hour on a task and become extremely tired. I can not even apply for work as the act of filling out a resume seems impossible.
Prior to this I was a very successful IT Director with a team of 60 in 3 countries. Now the simplest tasks are impossible for me.
Two years ago I would have thought this would be an inconceivable position for me end up in.
I am only 39. Oh well - that's life.
Every day I wake up more and more certain I made the right choice.
(Congratulations!)
I'm not a hiring manager, but I'd imagine from the perspective of one that claiming burnout as a reason for leaving actually signifies the opposite - you're unable to manage a proper work-life balance and there's a risk you'll burn out in a new job too.
What do you think?
You can buy valuable things like good health care, living wages, balanced lives, and self respect for employees, fair deals and support for improved lives for customers, a healthier market environment for the planet and future generations. You can buy being the person to make the better world you imagine and make it sustainable to perpetuate that.
These are all for sale and good business practices to boot.
Now fair enough I could have checked the /r/consulting sub and found plenty of horror stories, but also I would have asked for more money to reflect the hours worked.
Others will be in very different situations.
I had two stakeholders insist that 3 things all get done by the following Monday; I reported that wasn't going to be possible. They could not agree on priorities, so I sent an e-mail with the order I was going to work on them that went unanswered. The 3rd thing on the list didn't get done. My manager asked me why and I showed the e-mail chain. I got a "good job" and never heard about it again.
I would not have had the confidence to do this even just 10 years ago, and I suspect that the majority of junior engineers feel that way, and would work through the weekend to get everything done.
Whose fault would it be if I hadn't set boundaries and burnt out? I think there's shared blame and it depends on details. In this hypothetical situation, did my manager notice a lot of weekend work happening and check in with me? Perhaps they wouldn't because they expect a senior engineer to handle this balance, but they would have checked on a more junior engineer? Things aren't completely cut and dry.
People have to recognize their limitations and negotiate with their employer to make sure the employer does too. Sure, that requires attentive managers but it also requires employees who don't cede control of their lives to their employer.
If I want to change something, I run it past them. If it messes something up they come back and say no and why. And I decide if it is worth it to keep working here. Or between us we come up with something else to keep both parties happy.
At my workplace currently, management is pretty flexible and happy to go through whatever HR paperwork required.
A major component of management is operational effectiveness and redundancy. If someone burns out and you don't see it, your team is suddenly undersized and you needed to hire (and have a recruiting budget) yesterday.
Not saying that’s true in every case, but plenty of workaholics burn themselves out.
I've consulted a psychiatrist because it's clearly a recurring pattern that has fucked up my career progression. I've been told I might have ADHD.
I think the point (for me at least), is that some people aren't just meant to function in a full-time job. A bit of an exaggeration, but I tell myself that by the time that I'm 30, and I still have someone control my pace, schedule, and deadlines, that I'll kill myself (maybe just metaphorically).
If you leave a long gap in your resume they will be curious of course. Say you quit to pursue a self-employment opportunity and it didn't work out.
That assumes you get a chance to explain.
A lot of time your resume will just go in the trash as soon as they see a big gap in your work history.
And if you do get a chance to say you were pursuing some self-employment opportunity in the gap, that'll rarely be good enough, because what most hiring managers want to see that you kept your skills up to date in the interim and continued to do something related to your field (which people who are burnt out are unlikely to do). Otherwise you're going to fall behind... at least in the tech field.
Other things that matter are:
- how long were the gaps?
- how frequent were the gaps?
- how long did you work at each of your jobs?
If the gaps are long and/or the jobs are short, they're red flags. It doesn't mean you won't get hired, or won't get an interview, but every red flag lowers your chances.
With each gap you're digging yourself deeper and deeper in to a hole that will be progressively harder to climb out of.
My advice is to switch careers as soon as possible.. the longer you wait the harder it'll be. Your choice of alternate career doesn't have to be perfect, and it doesn't have to be "your calling" (often people don't even know their calling until they try it). It's important to try, and maybe try a whole bunch of different stuff until you find a good fit, and not to just languish and rot.
Easier said than done for someone suffering from burnout.. but that's the way out instead of sinking further in.
Of course breaks, therapy, and medication work for some, and I hope they work for you.
Maybe they could just check on specific skills they are looking to hire for. They can check if one is reasonably updated on recent industry/technology trends.
But if hiring folks are really hell bent on finding real reason on why I left the job and not working for last few years, I guess there is no practical way to escape out of it.
If you need mental health treatment (that you otherwise wouldn't need) to do your job and not despair? There's a good chance there's something wrong with your job.
What I'd totally expect to find is that, even moreso than old people retiring and feeling a sense of meaninglessness, people who stop working while they're still in their prime working years will grow listless because we're meant to do more, we're meant to take on challenge, maybe even a sacrifice. That the same inner and outer factors that make us depressed at our jobs are actually just also making us depressed generally and reflect an inner pathology where we view ourselves as hopeless, inferior, lost or stuck.
But the info really isn't coming to me at a glance, I don't have time to really do that research, and I don't think I'd be any happier if I did. Unless someone else with the free time and scientific literacy to peruse to a week-old post comes by and contributes the data with a decisive percent chance to this discussion, you either trust my intuition that there's a substantial but hard-to-nail down effect where we're miserable on account of more than our jobs and an unspecified "many" could have all our needs met but still be miserable because you feel what I'm talking about too, or you have your own intuition about the nature of our sense of well-being and work and want to question it. Given a quick glance at your post history you seem like a well-intentioned firebrand of a libertarian who gets downvoted a lot, and I can respect you for that.
I 100% sincerely hope you and everyone else on here reading this has an absolutely fantastic day.
I agree though that for many people their situation could be improved by the assistance of a mental health professional. But that doesn't mean that their problems are all caused internally and aren't to some degree a product of their work environment.
This point also makes me wonder if habitual burnouts are poor at evaluating potential managers during the interview process and as a result end up burning out repeatedly.
Quite the opposite for me. I was miserable in my first job. Not a single day where I wanted to go to work. After 4 years I quit and everyone told me that I need to change my attitude, and that all jobs are like this.
They. Were. Completely. Wrong.
I was very happy with my next job.
My 3rd job sucked (for different reasons). I wasn't anywhere near burnout, but my first two jobs taught me one thing: Life is too short to stay at a job that sucked. I moved on to the 4th job which ended up being awesome.
If you're miserable at your job, it may not be you - even if everyone around you thinks it is.
This XKCD is very relevant:
So yes, people should resist more but the system is more and more stacked up to take advantage of people's weaknesses. And blaming it on the employees is the same strategy fast food or tobacco companies are using. Yes, you can resist but you are up against a lot of well paid people who constantly try to hack your psychology to make you do the things they want you to do, even if it's harmful to you.
The subject also reminds me of Gabor Mate's "When The Body Says No"[1] about his theory that some physical illness stems from chronic stress [like one would have 'pushing through' burnout].
[0]https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/autistic-burnout-explained... [1]https://drgabormate.com/preview/when-the-body-says-no-chapte...
All of which make for a really vicious downward cycle.
I got to travel the world before Covid.
I learned the hard way that to avoid burnout, I have to take more unpaid days and be slow to respond outside business hours. I still tinker on my own software projects, to stay interested, but I am much more constrained about it now.
Self-care looks different for everyone.
For me, I run daily and paint wargame miniatures instead of playing video games at night. It is important for me to exercise, avoid screens and get outside much as possible. Last summer I got into solo hammock camping.
This is your life. It isn't happening later or somewhere else. Switch it up, make changes or else you will break instead of bend.
It makes for a good title, and it is true. If you think about it, it has always been the case.
If you can afford not to, why would you work for the man, right?
Edit:
For example, first job I just looked at
"You are:
Hungry, humble and smart..."
What other profession says nonsense like this, imagine saying this to a doctor or accountant.
Med students have to jump through an unimaginable number of hoops to prove that they will put up with anything because they are supposed to be hungry to save the world, humble in the face of nature, and smart enough to get a top percentile on a never-ending series of standardized admission and licensing exams.
By the time they're actually working in the field, it's: Did you fill out that insurance paperwork so the hospital can get reimbursed? Good, here's the next stack of paperwork to fill out so the hospital can get reimbursed ad infinitum. How fast are you seeing patients? Any more than 20 minutes is too long. We don't have staffing levels to support that. Nurses are over-ratio, but try not to kill anyone with a mistake.
This results in legally defensible treatment but not necessarily the treatment you really need.
Hopefully the system can fix itself.
As an introvert who would sometimes rather avoid the toll of socializing, I spent the first four years of my marriage unintentionally neglecting my wife and family because I saw people around me working 12 hour days and weekends to provide. So I did the same. The damage that “bringing home the bacon” mentality had on my ability to turn attention to the relationships I truly cherish is painful.
I’m working past it now and looking for jobs with more PTO and after-hours support strategies that aren’t “quick, let’s call Bob” for every fire. I hope you never hit the point I had to to turn things around. One quote that really turned things around for me goes like this:
> when you die, your coworkers will be upset for a time but your job will soon replace you. But the memory of your loss will be with your family forever.
Sure there is that initial “this is so liberating” energy but doesn’t take many missed paycheques for them to go quiet on that front.
Especially the ones that adopted a freelancing or entrepreneur path instead. Doesn’t exactly replace a paycheque overnight as hn knows.
…so of all my friends the ones I worry about the most are the ones that embraced this.
I am planning on quitting at 33, and I am doing that with a real plan, not "freelancing"
Thing is I have no interest getting back to a paycheck. I get money here, some there always more than I need and have more free time than most people.
I know what kind of people you are talking about, however it's not impossible to build some somewhat stable recurring income.
COBRA is too expensive for me ACA plans are terrible unless you go for the most expensive one.
I have been voluntarily unemployed since December. Obviously if you make money this doesn't work.
To clarify: I own my house and have hundreds of thousands in assets and I am qualified for Medicaid. I didn't believe it either. The quality of care is great. State is PA.
Edit: medicaid, not Medicare. I am not even close to 65.
I’ve taken time off before after hitting my four year vest window and dealing with an office bully. I said forget it and just quit one day. Took a month off before reality set in that I can’t stop learning skills in my career or otherwise I’d be antiquated fairly quickly if I ever came back.
> Coined in the 1970s by American psychologist Herbert Freudenberger, it referred to the consequences of severe stress and “high ideals” within the “helping professions” like medicine and social work.
I feel "high ideals" can have an impact on job satisfaction. It's safer to take the pay check and practice your ideals outside the job. If you seek ideals at work and your ideals clash with your company or boss it can be devastating.Walking out is one way to communicate that you want to be free to live the ideals you choose...
I got laid off last Oct due to Covid and got a nice cash settlement due to my years worked.
People expect me to be all depressed and moping about for not having a job (SAP developer) but I have never been happier !!!!.
LOL @ burnout. The people who are really burnt out work in hospitals and we all pressure them not to quit. There's nothing burnout-ish about the pandemic, quite the opposite, it's a long pause, a period of silence which gave people ample time and space to reassess their options.
In my experience "exhaustion" is a less provocative while also being a more accurate description of what is going on. Being in a competitive, high productivity mode as much as possible can take a toll on people especially in the modern always connected environment.
The workaholism comparison to drug addiction is actually pretty apt, too.
No one is going to assume you did a ton of psychedelics or speed and broke your brain, even if that's what happened (I rather suspect stimulant use is a factor in more programmer burnout than one might like to think).