For the visually impaired, it's not "difficult" to use, it's closer to "impossible" to use.
By toning back the language, you've made it sound like whining and not a legitimate concern. You make it easy to ignore.
By toning back the language, you've made it sound like whining and not a legitimate concern. You make it easy to ignore.
>These are catastrophic design failures for the new UX, and directly harms both end-users due to eye-strain, and directly harms visually impaired individuals due to lack of visual clarity. It makes the app less accessible, and is not only visually displeasing, but actively ableist in nature.
> being denied access to something other people can use is a type of harm
But in a twisted way, maybe this kind of argument works. We are talking about it after-all.