https://www.cdw.com/product/Samsung-40-Full-HD-Non-Smart-Hos...
https://www.cdw.com/product/samsung-hg40nf690gf-nf690-series...
https://www.cdw.com/product/Samsung-40-Full-HD-Non-Smart-Hos...
https://www.cdw.com/product/samsung-hg40nf690gf-nf690-series...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18905408 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21781481
But its presence can be sold for a hundred more, because the consumers apparently... want these features? Things like YouTube, Netflix, video calls, etc. And, of course, voice control.
Citation? Because I find that assumption outlandish.
I've watched them replace the control board in my 7 year old Vizio TV, the hardware is significantly better than anything but the highest end current RPi. Dual core cpu, quad core gpu, AC wifi, 8gb of memory, and the ability to push 4k HDR video at 120hz.
You keep saying they're all selling personal data for hundreds of dollars, citation?
For a TV manufacturer, most of these costs don't appear because they just need to add a few components to an existing PCB, and add more tests for them.
The other part of costs is licensing and/or development of software, its ongoing maintenance, extended tech support (online, phone), maybe sometimes content deals (a free month of Netflix, or something).
Since you are talking about a Vizio tv, here's some straight from their CTO's mouth:
https://www.theverge.com/2019/1/7/18172397/airplay-2-homekit...
"So look, it’s not just about data collection. It’s about post-purchase monetization of the TV.
This is a cutthroat industry. It’s a 6-percent margin industry, right? I mean, you know it’s pretty ruthless. You could say it’s self-inflicted, or you could say there’s a greater strategy going on here, and there is. The greater strategy is I really don’t need to make money off of the TV. I need to cover my cost."
To that price, you also need to add a continuous software development for the OS and some apps (even if they are Open Source, because they need to do at least some modifications). Minor bugs will happen and you would need to solve them.
Also, more complex hardware and software usually equals more complex testing and debugging, and with this more person-hours and a bigger cost. At the end, it might not be $100, but it will be near enough to round it for $100.
To be clear, this is said without having ever worked in a TV manufacturing company, but knowing how this kind of things are made, I think I'm not too far from reality.