And it's particularly important to have this property for text, because not only data is overwhelmingly stored as text (in importance, not by "weight"), but because computer programs themselves are written using text.
And it's particularly important to have this property for text, because not only data is overwhelmingly stored as text (in importance, not by "weight"), but because computer programs themselves are written using text.
Sadly, I kind of gave up on getting a "HDR" display, at least for now, because :
- AFAIK neither Linux nor Windows have good enough "HDR" support yet. (MacOS supposedly does, but I'm not interested.)
- I'm happy enough with my HP LP2475w which I got for dirt cheap just before "HDR" became a thing. I consider the 1920x1200 resolution to be perfect for now (as a bonus I can manually scale various old resolutions like 800x600 to be pixel-perfect) - too many programs/OSes still have issues with auto-scaling programs on higher resolution screens (which would come with "HDR"). I'm also particularly fond of the 16:10 ratio, which seems to have gone extinct.
- Maybe I'll be able to run this monitor properly in wide gamuts (though with banding), or maybe even in some kind of ""HDR" compatibility mode", though it would seem that the current sellers of "HDR" screens aren't going to make that easy. I might be able to get a colorimeter soon to properly calibrate it.
I'm not sure what DICOM has to do with color reproduction quality ? Also it seems to be a quite a bit older standard than sRGB...
By definition, you can't "see the unseen". "Yellow" and "blue" are opponent "colors", so, by definition, a proper mixture of them is going to give you grey :
https://www.handprint.com/HP/WCL/color2.html#opponentfunctio...
Also, when talking about subtle color effects, you have to consider that personal variation might come into play (for instance red-green "colorblindness" is a spectrum).