The charging infrastructure is a competitive advantage. Tesla is a business we are talking about capitalism. You can charge your EV at home, you won’t need a fuelling station. That is progress.
So on the one hand the charging infrastructure is a competitive advantage, but then you immediately undermine yourself by saying you don't need it because you can charge at home. That seems confused.
> Tesla is a business we are talking about capitalism.
How quickly you've lost sight of that vision for humanity.
Thanks for your reply, you see competition is working.
There's no need to imagine it. That's what Shell, Total, and BP are doing. And, unlike Tesla, any EV can use their chargers. Some reading:
- https://www.electrive.com/2021/02/12/shell-to-install-half-a...
- https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/technology-news/shell-tar...
- https://www.electrive.com/2021/04/12/shell-reveals-charging-...
- https://www.electrive.com/2021/05/03/charge4europe-and-total...
- https://www.greencarcongress.com/2021/03/20210331-bp.html
- https://www.fleetnews.co.uk/news/latest-fleet-news/electric-...
- https://freewiretech.com/bp-pulse-and-freewire-sign-exclusiv...
- https://freewiretech.com/news/freewire-deploys-next-generati...
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaSRn6hYOwc
> Your frustration is probably because the only company that gets it is tesla.
No. You're caught up in the marketing and the mythology. You've lost sight of the practical realities.