Since each increase in uptime costs so much, requires peaker plants, and makes intermittent renewables harder, I experimented with living more resiliently. After all, the reverse works too: each decrease in uptime saves huge costs, relaxes needs for peaker plants, and makes intermittent renewables more feasible.
Most of the world can handle some downtime. Electric power didn't exist for most of human existence. We've become more needy, dependent, and entitled. I suspected that living more resiliently would improve my life.
It did. My last three electric bills were $1.40, $1.70, and $1.70 (plus tax and fixed connection costs). That's living in Greenwich Village, Manhattan. I wrote up some of my experience here, with scans of my bills: https://joshuaspodek.com/i-used-2-5-the-average-americans-el....
I don't expect many people to reach this level of resilience and stewardship, but we don't have to to decrease our insane entitlement to such uptime. A few cultural changes and we could lower our grid costs tremendously while improving our quality of life.
At my house, I'd be happy with just 2 nines. Maybe the same for street lighting or sewerage treatment.
For that, I would like to not pay for the peak capacity doubly-redundant inspected monthly power lines. Let those who actually want reliability pay.
I propose that the electric company provide meters which can have selectable 'reliability', and merely shut off lower service tiers like me whenever a line is down or generation reaches capacity. For a property that already has a GFCI/RCD, a $6 mesh LoRA board and a 1 cent resistor is sufficient for the energy company to switch off the GFCI.
Edit: you also mention sewage. I personally would not be happy with no sewage for 3.5 days in a row
Sewage treatment systems typically have a few days spare capacity.