So people are just paying for your opinion or do you have some sort of credentials?
I find it ironic that you are selling authenticity checks, and yet I can't tell if the check is authentic.
I find it ironic that you are selling authenticity checks, and yet I can't tell if the check is authentic.
* We write public guides (see: https://legitcheck.app/explore-the-library/) - we have about 1m words written on the subject * People are free to contest it. If we're wrong, we'll correct * The more other people link to our guides, the more we get... credentials, I guess?
Can't the infosec community define and setup a "trust" network?
E.g. everybody trusts a number of people, and trust can be transitive (perhaps with weights). Hence when I read some review the network can compute a trustworthiness value. If the product turns out to be fake, the system can do a backprop and adjust weights. Etc. etc.
But the challenge would then be to explain something like this to the average non-techie who's just buying some expensive sneakers because they're cool
That's why we never considered charging for our guides, even something as little as $1 → The point was to allow people to inform themselves about fakes, with as little friction as possible
That way, if we bump the % of people who get scammed by even a few negative points, we'd still be happy for a positive contribution