https://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-sn-yogi-berra...
And when there's lack of housing, the two choices are high prices and homelessness, or wait lists and homelessness. Neither are good, but the solution is really just more housing.
In CA, Governor Neusome signed some sort of mandate, that put hard limits (build more you NIMBY's) on new housing.
It was done for the right reasons. A lot of his wealthy supporters could care less about rent, but he doesn't seem to be able to be bought--yet.
It's tied to state funds? I would like to know more, but too lazy to do research.
Our little towns, in Marin County, are scrambling for a solution to enable more housing. I shouldn't have used "scrambling". I don't think they really care. They own their homes, but they need funds.
Ok---that said, I don't know how they can think about building anything because of the water shortage?
Not having enough water is huge. They could offer incentives for digging wells I guess?
I am glad Neusome made putting in a mother in-law units much easier. We need more low/middle income housing. We need less mansions though. Neusome is a rich boy, but has progressive values. I went to school with him, and he knows what a struggle life can be sometimes. Yes--even for a rich boy, I felt sorry for him a bit at certain points in his life. He was actually voted most Fashionable in the year book.
Fun fact for those that know nothing about Marin County. Most of you have probally heard of Bolinas before? The town without a sign. A town the locals want kept a secret?
The history of building in Bolinas is kinda interesting. Years ago a bunch of hippies, and other brilliant creative people, saw what a beautiful area Bolinas is, but they knew it could be ruined by overbuilding. They knew it was a far commute, but people would suffer with the long drive to SF because it was such a idyllic location.
The hippies got themselfs on the town council. (I use hippies in the best sence. The world needs more hippies.)
They passed a law that the size of their town would be mandated by water hookups.
There is a hard set number of water hookups, and they went quick. A few years ago a small plot of land with a water hookup became available. Just a tiny piece of land, but it had a legal water spigot. It went for a huge amount money.
Mu point is without more water, I don't know how these housing mandates will work?
A desalination plant might work?
Would I mind seeing a desalination plant instead of San Quentin--yes. San Quentin is a prison right near the bay. It's old, and just a prison to be honest. A lot of those guys could be in a minimum security prison, in better living conditions, but that's another story.
I would like to see some Stimulus money being spent on a desalination plant.
I know nothing about the technology though. I just know water is something very important.
I do feel the wealthy, and those living in mansions, should pay more for water than the rest of us.
(Yes-- I'm all over the place today. I guess I'm nervous over reopening? I need to take a walk.)
The cities are overrun, sanitation and safety is badly compromised, yet half the US homeless are in California with more coming. This is a primary reason along with cost of living why people are leaving.
This video about Bonin, supervisor for world famous Venice Beach in LA encapsulates the mayhem and dystopian lack of logic exhibited by the current bureaucracy. https://vimeo.com/532718306