Linux Air Combat (2019)
askmisterwizard.com
askmisterwizard.com
> Furthermore, because LAC is intended as a realistic simulator and not as a mere game ... It’s all just history and science. If you already have a good understanding of the aerodynamic and air combat sciences, you won’t even need to read the instructions once you have your controls mapped to your liking!
> sim pilots willing to use a little imagination will easily fantasize that the experience is real
I'm not entirely convinced this is not a parody. The wording, the weirdly pompous adjectives, the game itself. I get that it's supposed to be a little retro, and that's fine, but at the same time they're comparing it to Combat Flight Simulator 2 and talking about realism with a straight face.
Or even better, save your time, just move on.
What do you mean? I said it's not parody.
I remember it being listed in a book called the "Solaris games book" about games that were available for Solaris.
It's not mentioned in the wikipedia page, but it was ported to many systems.
There are few actually active projects probably from mid 90s:
ACM 6.0[0] (fully open-source) — an extended fork of ACM 5.0[1] (MSFS 2.0-like).[2]
YSFlight[3] (freeware & partially open-source) — fully polygonal multipurpose 3D flight simulator. As a side project its developer also created Polygon Crest[4] app — open-source 3D polygonal editor on the same toolkit for creating addons for YSFlight.[5]
[0] http://www.icosaedro.it/acm/download.html
[1] https://wiki.flightgear.org/ACM_(flight_sim)
[2] https://twitter.com/app4soft/status/1237898195385987076
[3] https://ysflight.org/download/
Oh... You mean quotes as in '"', right? In that case put it between quotes to note that it my be underpowered by today standards but have respectable specs compared to SGI workstations of the day. I have no benchmark to base my argument, but I do have a gut feeling.
I'd suggest removing pretty much all of the quotation marks to improve readability.
Edit: In the post in the thread here, the quotes around the word underpowered are being used as scare quotes [1] but the more you do that the less readable a document becomes because you're putting the cognitive load of inferring the intention of the punctuation onto the reader! I would recommend using quotes for quotations/speech only.
Edit2: PS Grammatical quibbles aside this is a good post, thanks for writing & submitting it!
- can be run without a “gaming-class” video card.
- the three lower “graphic detail” levels
- -on ten year-old Intel “Core II Duo” or
- comprehensive “YouTube” playlists,
- well-known “AskMisterWizard.com” web site
- Microsoft "Windows"
- YouTube "PlayList"
This one is acceptable, because you're essentially defining LAC as an acronym for the first time, and a change of context is acceptable:
LINUX Air Combat (or “LAC”)
That's not to say it's' needed. I'd have written it: LINUX Air Combat (LAC)
or LINUX Air Combat (henceforth referred to as “LAC”)
In another section, you wrote the following:Overall, LAC’s features compare favorably with Windows-based flight sims from the genre’s “classic” period, like “Combat Flight Simulator 2”, or “Air Warrior III”, or “Aces High I”, or “Warbirds”.
It could have been written this way:
Overall, LAC’s features compare favorably with Windows based flight sims from the genre’s classic period, rivalling such titles as Combat Flight Simulator 2, Air Warrior III, Aces High I, and Warbirds.
Although I do not claim grammatical perfection, It think the rewritten example is more readable. But, I've seen many native English speakers/writers who'd have done it this way: Overall, LAC’s features compare favorably with Windows based flight sims from the genre’s classic period, rivalling such titles as "Combat Flight Simulator 2", "Air Warrior III", "Aces High I", and "Warbirds".
Again, I do not claim perfection. I only care about grammar as far as it affects readability, and I'm known to take Creative License with it when I feel like it. (See what I did there?)Yes, but like so often with English grammar, there are exceptions. E.g., scare quotes.
It's somewhat "mature" in content, however absolutely brilliantly funny.
EDIT: nevermind, I can't find the source. The site is full of links to binaries and videos but not any repos or source archives. I found something that looked like combined source and binaries but source forge wouldn't let me download it because "downloads aren't possible on this device" (how the hell do you fuck up file downloads like this? The default appache config would be an improvement! )
It looks like their thing might be optimisation for low-powered systems (like RPi).