Quirksmode is seeking to raise € 2,500 in donations
quirksmode.org
quirksmode.org
Great job, Internet!
http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2009/04/google_spons...
I can't see these any more so I think it fair to assume they don't.
Quirksmode seems more detailed. Caniuse.com has an unobtrusive ad at the bottom as well as a Flattr link.
Too late.
Also, it's a weekly rate for his consulting business, not personal income.
I'd rather have him not give a discount. Why not let people pay for what they use? How did we get to a state where everybody expects everything to be handed to them for free?
Erm... you may want to note that this is a resource which has always been free and a major contribution to PPK's fame, which in turn is why he can quote rates of 5k€/week.
Which is not what he's doing. Or did you manage to miss the 2500€ rate? He's just providing a reduced rate for history's sake.
You might start off that way, but then you'd think "Hmm, if I do an extra few weeks I can buy a nicer car / a fancy new camera / a better computer / go on an expensive holiday / save up more money in case I get too old or too sick to work", and then after a few iterations of that it would be "Hmm, if I work an extra month every year then I can afford a bigger house" a few times. And, since this is consulting income we're talking about, every now and then it would be "Whoa, it was scary not being able to find any work for six months. Just as well I had a little money saved. I'd better work extra hard for a little while to build up my reserves again".
Of course, you might be different. Some people are. But when you have the option of getting a lot more money for a modest amount of extra work, it's really hard not to do it.
When consulting you need to build up money to pay yourself for time when you're not working, but as a paid employee you'd get 'built in'. e.g. (a) 4 weeks holidays per year, (b) about 1 week illness, (c) 2 weeks(ish) publis holidays per year (d) 1 week (more?) of administration/taxes/form filling. Before you know it you can't work all 52 weeks in the year! And that implies you're working full time. Contractors often have lulls when they have no work. No work, no pay!
HN people rely for a lot of their income through ads I know, but it doesn't change the feeling (I changed that work from "fact"!) that it detracts from the content. Thanks for your awesome work PPK, I'm donating now!
In your opinion, which is a minority viewpoint.
Advertising works, providing a service both to the advertiser and the consumer.
I know that's an incredibly unpopular viewpoint within this bubble, but there you go.
If it was the case that most people found advertising 'shit', then you'd see more and more people installing adblock etc. But that hasn't happened. It's still used by a very small minority of users as it has always been. It's sort of like the Opera web browser in that respect.
When you buy a photography magazine, it might have 20% of the pages covered by advertising. I'd say most people buying the magazine find them useful. Maybe only 1% convert to a sale, but I'd say the majority of people find the adverts useful.
Also, it's not a black and white thing between "content" and "advertising". For example, quite often adverts in digital camera magazines are handy for me because they show me new products or lenses I didn't know about - Those adverts are 'content'.
I'm not going to convince anyone who hates advertising to open their mind a little though, so I'll retire happily to my ad-supported magazines, and ad-supported websites.
People also come across thousands of ads that they ignore every day in billboards, shopping windows etc. That's not a legitimate reason to rule out advertising as a revenue option. (On the other hand, claiming that the majority of people find them useful is a bit of a stretch)
Not 0.05% that's insanely low.
Mind you, a lot of those sites (the high end, anyway) are optimized strongly for clicks. The ads show up in the middle of content (as an "interlude") or prominently above the fold.