But there's a massive difference in saying "Policing in this country is broken - cops kill too many people" versus "Cops and lot of white _and_ black people.. see? BLM is a pointless movement". Right wingers seem to love to pretend they're saying the former when they actually mean the latter.
There's a reason why mentions of studies that are including white victims quickly get flagged on HN, as this article was, obviously.
But yeah such political content is unfortunately bound to be flagged in HN unless it has some sort of explicit tech connection.
An example of this aggressive, non-empathetic, censoring attitude that grinds my gears would be when that FB employee tried to publicly shame a colleague for opting not to put a BLM banner on the developer docs of RecoilJS. The whole mantra of "Silence is violence" can apparently now be used to accuse anyone of the terrible thoughtcrime of not talking about racism at all times.. even in places and situations where it doesn't make sense or wouldn't help the cause.
Extrapolate this out to how many people are unwilling to consider or merely listen to viewpoints that aren't in complete alignment (with whatever the accuser holds to be the absolute truth of non-racism).. yuck.
IMO