However, if an interview is really LeetCode-based, I'd say it's a fair game for the interviewee to do some preparation. In my opinion, the best kind of interview is based on real production needs, the interview question (regardless whether or not it's came from LeetCode) should reflect that.
Is it similar to Blind in that it's a lot of people talking about how to pragmatically game the interview process?
* Just interviewed at {firm}, here are the questions:
1. Question One: here are the math and stats subquestions.
2. Question Two: here is the Leetcode question they asked.
3. Question Three: here is another question and my solution.
4. ...
Followed by other users posting stuff like "Thank you Landlord {OP}" or "Giving rice {forum clout points} to this Landlord {OP}." Guests without accounts are tourists. I'd say it's like the Leetcode discussion forums except they're leaking actual company interview questions.
This insiders-have-a-large-advantage factor may be at least part of why the practices survive. People without a friend & colleague network frequently interviewing at those places have a strong disadvantage... unless they hire people to scout for them, which the Twitter poster also claimed is a thing that happens.