> US Labor Secretary is a product of union politics
The man heading state labor policy is a "product" of the labor movement. Is that supposed to be a scandal?
> easier for the AFL/CIO and Teamsters to unionize them
Good.
The man heading state labor policy is a "product" of the labor movement. Is that supposed to be a scandal?
> easier for the AFL/CIO and Teamsters to unionize them
Good.
If unions aren't doing that because they are compromised or sclerotic or whatever, then they aren't much use. Who would argue.