Ballmer certainly looks like a great boss, having great care for good engineering practices such as yelling, throwing chairs at people and being generally obnoxious.
Also, user experience is a part of good engineering.
Also, user experience is a part of good engineering.
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Steve-Jobs-Not-Shy-of-Using-t...
we can both play this game all day.
user experience is indeed a part of good engineering, but it's not the be-all and end-all, and eventually you will /always/ run into a place where you must compromise between a system which is well-engineered and one that behaves in accordance with user expectation.
this is why OS X doesn't have full ASLR and DEP, because it can cause applications to start crashing at random because they were poorly written in a way that used to be invisible.
this is why UAC on Windows Vista is a terrible experience, because even trusted applications need to prompt the user to make sure they approve of them executing on an administrator token.
this is why our operating systems still have to reboot while applying security updates, because long-running services and the kernel have to be replaced and there's no good way to do it seamlessly yet.
UAC is, in principle, not at odds with equating good user experience with good engineering. It’s all about tradeoffs.
Right. There are ways to do it, but not any /good/ ones. Good here meaning "while still letting the software execute efficiently and without a ton of added complexity"
why does the UAC need to gray/black out all the display?
It's such a mess, especially when you have more than one monitor. Is there a technical reason or is it just UX?
And I disagree that you will always need to compromise between good engineering and good UX, for example you can certainly have ASLR and DEP with the same UX OS X currently has, they don't add any burden on the user.
Of course sometimes you need to compromise, but it's not everytime.