Facebook Stopped Employees From Reading Internal Report About Insurrection
buzzfeednews.com
buzzfeednews.com
But the leaked document itself is fascinating, both as a post mortem of sorts and as an example of high quality anti abuse work. It is an area where little gets published for obvious reasons, and every group needs to learn the same lessons from scratch. Great read.
> Here is the full text of Facebook’s internal report.
Based on the table, HELLCAT seems like a keyword/sentiment analysis system that surfaces outliers (this group uses terms like "Mainstream Media (MSM)" at a higher average rate than a control group, etc).
> “The authors never intended to publish this as a final document to the whole company," a Facebook spokesperson said in a statement. "They inadvertently published it to a broad audience and they simply restricted it to the internal working group it was intended for."
> The spokesperson added that it was the authors who restricted access to the report.
These are 2nd amendment types, uncolleged, who all forgot to bring their assault rifles, riot gear and bomb-making equipment to a violent takeover of the US capitol.
There weren’t even videos of burning cars or distant gunshots. To call something that looked more like a college sit-in an “armed insurrection” sounds like framing the pitiful as dangerous and unstable, leading to false imprisonments.
The TL;DR is that Facebook mistakenly published an internal report on an internal board, then upon realizing it, restricted its access.