Mystery Pineapple in an Ancient Mosaic
eyesofrome.com
eyesofrome.com
The theory presented is either missing some background knowledge we need to understand it (pinecones were highly valuable to Romans? I dunno) or it makes no sense.
To me it seems the mosaic indeed shows what looks like a "young" pine cone (i.e. you see square platelets), not the open one you would get pinecone nuts from.
A quick googling suggests a few Russian recipes[0] though I feel I had them somewhere in Greece.
[0] https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rbth.com/russian-kitchen/32...
Before that they are not ripe, but once they are open the nuts quickly fall off (at which point you look for them under the tree before the squirrels do).
I grew up in Italy and I remember pine nuts being much more mainstream there as a food, compared to other countries where I've lived. They are consumed both by themselves and as ingredients in various recipes (an example is Pesto sauce - the original Italian version uses pine nuts - another example is the Tuscan "torta della nonna", a type of dessert).
Obviously the ancient Roman cuisine was very different compared to modern Italian food but I suspect Romans may have been eating pine nuts too.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/tiny-blue-beads-eu...
It doesn't mean it's a pineable though, Occam razor would lead me to thing it's more likely a fruit most people are not accustom to see.
E.G: figue de barbarie: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Figue_de_Barbarie (and if you wonder, it's very good)
Not that I think it's a figue de barbarie, the body matches, but not the head, yet there are a lot of fruits people don't know about, or it could have been a fruit that disappeared since. After all, we lost a whole class of banana type, why not other things?
they are also quite commonly grown and eaten in Italy, but apparently they are also of American origin.
Wikipedia lists the following synonyms: Indian fig opuntia, Barbary fig, cactus pear, prickly pear, spineless cactus, and tuna (borrowed from Mexican Spanish).
It's actually not that easy to recognise what the mosaic is showing, especially with so much missing context after a couple thousand years. Bit of a stretch to call that thing a pineapple then.
Edit: Oh, and what's that behind the "pineapple"? That's even harder to decipher than anything else in the basket.
Come to that, can anyone recognise the species of fish below the basket?
Figs (or garlic), quince, grapes and pomegranates
Here's a larger image of the mosaic: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e8/0_Mosaic...
Also, I think it's just a pine cone.
A counter argument is why would a pineapple have been brought over and not the much more useful potato and corn?
Nicotine production isn't limited to tobacco; it's been found in the bark of various acacia species, for example.
It's supposed to be a pineapple the size of... 6 grapes?
It looks like a small dinner roll. It doesn't look anything like a pineapple.
This feels like an entirely made-up mystery, like something tour guides invented to try to make the tour interesting.
Apart from that you've described a stone pine pinecone (which is why pineapples are called that...).
I’m not sure that “Romans didn’t know how to draw pinecones” is really the most logical solution.
It's too bad nobody hired him to represent pineapples, though, because he would have done a great job.
Also, pineapples are called that because they look like pinecones (and perhaps especially those pinecones).
As all the other fruits in the basket are from Mediterranean, and it seems to have leaves at one end, my candidate would be an african root vegetable that for some reason would be forgotten later in Occident. My main candidate would be Colocasia esculenta that is from China, but was cultured in the Mediterranean since the Roman empire at least. Size, color and leaves fit. Can't be consumed without a special processing that is well known in Africa but is not part of the culture in Europe.
Lotus root was a common crop in Egypt and could fit also if we assume that the pineapple pattern could be wrong.
Pineapple has a very different arrangement of leaves much more spread, stout and spiny, and this fruit has the wrong size and wrong shape also.
Widely known as taro root.
What's more likely, pineapples were known in ancient Rome but there's only a single picture of one ever where the strange and exotic fruit isn't even foregrounded, and no mention in any written text ever? Or there's one mosaic among all preserved images and writings which has a weird anomalous representation of something European that could be interpreted as a pineapple?
She grew up in Soviet-run Ukraine, so I guess you work with what you have, but it's not out of the realm of possibility that people in Europe thousands of years ago figured out you could eat pine cones, too.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandanus_tectorius#/media/File...
Although admittedly it's not particularly likely that this made it to Rome either, and it's non-edible to boot.
https://gyppotravelreviews.wordpress.com/2019/03/16/unusual-...
https://www.thespruceeats.com/thmb/ccOvmaY71HiTZ9EOOk9cnxOsG...
Also, pine nuts are very expensive, here in Spain at least.
... but that introduces another issue, because I grew up eating those in South America and it turns out the tree originates in Australia. But it's not unthinkable that a similar pine cone could be found in Europe (and the vast Roman Empire of the time).
[1] https://jerry-coleby-williams.net/2015/02/15/bunya-prehistor...
They are usually around pear size.
There is a video of a family collecting and preparing them here on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qH4nSgEIVKo
Double facepalm, Picard-style.