I also invite you to read my response above to someone else regarding the security of such an algorithm: with some examples, brute forcing an algorithm is easier than brute forcing a master password.
I also invite you to read my response above to someone else regarding the security of such an algorithm: with some examples, brute forcing an algorithm is easier than brute forcing a master password.
I'd argue even those who think they do probably don't.
To me the whole conversation sounds like this:
- An unknown, low security bank was broken into.
- This proves storing your money in a bank is a terrible idea! This is why I keep all my money in my home.
- No that's definitely a worse idea. Storing your money in a bank is the most secure way to keep your money. It's not infallible but-
- Yes but alone i don't have that much money... It's a lot more attractive if it's in a big oot everybody else's.
- Well no, most good banks invest a lot more in security than you ever would or could.
- No it's okay, because I put it in a box and I have a lock on it.
- Like a safe?
- No. I don't trust safes either.
Doesn’t this very article show otherwise?