Takeaways from Folding Our Startup
grinn.it
grinn.it
Hey, what's your new site?
grin it, check it out.
Grabs smartphone, types in grinit.com, nope nothing, grin.it, nope nothing. done.
Keep and understand the distinction between a bad PRODUCT and piss poor marketing.
The first part of the conversation would go more like this:
Hey, what's your new site?
grinnit with two n's. So grinn dot it.
However, there is definitely a problem when a search for "grin it" on google doesn't find your site. Moreover when a search for "grin it photos" or "grinit photos" is also unsuccessful. That's definitely a problem. If the spelling of your website isn't immediately obvious (a la reddit), you just need to ensure that users can still find your site.
I don't think it's a horrible name. Seeing it in print makes it instantly memorable which is always helpful, they just needed some additional work on seo for the typos of their name. Calling it "piss poor marketing" is disingenuous and unnecessarily inflammatory.
Look, Being an entrepreneur is not about lining up your ducks 100%, but it is about getting each element of your project as close to "pretty damn good" as possible. Don't let something as important as brand slip to the side guys. It IS important.
We were going to call it http://trololololololololololo.com/ but that was already taken.
Wish you were there when we were working on the backup name, sounds like you would have been very helpful
Is this how you take feedback? Someone has taken time out to give you a sensible feedback and you call him/her a troll?
Maybe it sounded a bit harsh, but c'mmon.
It says a lot about you Mr Kennedy.
HOWEVER, name / domain was not at all the root cause of what we decided was ultimately the reason to stop pursuing this endeavor.
My advice to others is: never give up.
I think the startup ecosystem is woefully lacking in negative outcome posts like these. It's fun to write about your awesome traction, your latest funding round, but it's painful and bitter to write about failure. As a result, many new entrepreneurs get a highly distorted perception of the probability of success.
These new entrepreneurs look around and see guys/gals of comparable intelligence and think to themselves, if Jimmy can build a $500M company, I surely can build a $50M company. After all, he's not 10 times smarter than me, and I see everyone winning on every post I read.
What this assessment belies is that for every Jimmy, there are hundreds, if not thousands of other startup attempts that have acheived moderate results or outright failure.
So I welcome the author's post and ecourage more to do more self-reflection, if only to give a more balanced views as to really how hard this road is.
I'm sure there are many others like you who had a "never give up" attitude and put it all on the line for their business and then still drove their companies through the ground, entering financial ruin and perhaps destroying relationships (marriages, etc).
"Never give up" is a good mantra to have, but in reality sometimes you should give up... for now. If you're giving up your current company because the model is unworkable and the brand has no intrinsic value, that's a perfectly valid thing to do.
Sometimes you need to "pivot" more than you really can within the box you've built for your current small company. Regroup in the working class and then start a new thing later... that isn't really "giving up" and sometimes it is 100% the right thing to do.
Was one of those times being, oh, I dunno, $180k in personal debt? Just pulled that number out of thin air (didn't happen to me personally), but I would disagree (as would your bankers/financiers/investors) that there is never a time to 'give up'. You could perhaps mask it as a 'pivot' (or whatever term is in vogue at the time) but "giving up" is something some people eventually have to do.
Congrats on doing $1M in business. Realize that you didn't get there solely because you didn't give up, though. There were other factors involved beyond just "keeping on keeping on". I don't even know what those factors were, but they existed.
True to any consumer-facing startup. When you successfully scale up, you have to somehow keep the quality.
Note to self : think about this "beforehand" ...