Oh, and Starship prompt [2] too.
At least add a style="max-width: 840px" or so to the <body>-tag.
I definitely recommend the grep and find alternative, a lot more intuitive.
bat: https://github.com/sharkdp/bat
tldr: https://tldr.sh/
https httpie.io/hello
[1]: https://github.com/httpie/httpie/blob/master/CHANGELOG.rst#2...This is the pinnacle of design.
So close to greatness, yet so far.
Damn the open-source world is small.
I think the animated gif in the background is charming.
And, seriously, I get that some people find the joke distasteful. That's largely why I put it in the title--so they could at least not be surprised by it when they started to read more in depth.
The compiler serves its own source code. Read the HTML generator/server code here:
https://nn-512.com/browse/NN-512#45
You could also look at Fabrice Bellard's websites. They are a paragon of clarity and simplicity
That line is what got me to try it. I didn't like it so much at that time. Then I tried it again a few years later. And I switched back, again. Recently, I've tried it again, and I'm still using it.
It's a CLI "enhancer" for git
It's a good page because it contains comparisons too all other emacs package managers[0], and carefully describes the pros and cons of each package manager. I wish more open source projects would do this.
[0] https://github.com/raxod502/straight.el#comparison-to-other-...
https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/
http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/
https://thebestmotherfucking.website/
https://perfectmotherfuckingwebsite.com/
Enjoy :)
(as seen in uBlock Origin)
??
https://github.com/wallix/awless https://github.com/charmbracelet/glow
https://github.com/sindresorhus/sindresorhus-cli
Frankly, anything by Sindre is worth checking out: https://github.com/sindresorhus
This isn't something that's doable for every utility, but especially with the advent of WASM and easier cross-compiling from C, I wish more CLI/API documentation would allow me to play around with examples or try out a command on their docs page or in a sandbox; particularly if they're selling themselves as having a composable interface.
That's not only helpful for figuring out whether or not I want to use the project, it's also helpful when I look at a piece of documentation and am not sure which flag or option is actually important.
Mixer4 (closed source, though): http://www.acousticrefuge.com/mixer4.htm
Edbrowse: http://edbrowse.org/
K2pdfopt: https://willus.com/k2pdfopt/
But you don't need to do any design/css, the theme is available: https://terminalcss.xyz/
It’s not exclusively for CLI projects, and their own website is pretty nice IMO.
Also, the website is 32k ;-)
It's basically a binary format that has a 1:1 compatible text format. The idea is that everything stays in binary format (which is faster to process, more efficient, and smaller), and then convert the document to text only if/when a human needs to see it or edit the document.
It could still be further compressed using a general purpose compressor like gzip, but the main purpose of the data format is to be easy for a machine to process compared to JSON/XML/etc, and tight in specification so that you don't end up with exploitable security holes due to implementation differences like you do with JSON/XML: https://labs.bishopfox.com/tech-blog/an-exploration-of-json-...
Heirloom troff: http://n-t-roff.github.io/heirloom/doctools.html
Plan 9 Port: https://9fans.github.io/plan9port/
Back in the day, you would release your software on Freshmeat.net (https://web.archive.org/web/20010528211603/http://freshmeat....). You would get excited if people clicked on your project (https://web.archive.org/web/20100627062409/http://freshmeat....), but you'd get more excited if people downloaded your software, because it meant people were actually trying it out. (I can't find the graphs anymore, but it used to show you if anyone had clicked on the .tar.gz of your source code. It also used to have comments, but in later versions seems like comments were removed)
Anyone else remember back when the web was useful?
If you’d like to email me the address in my profile I will post a serious response in my blog. Long story short, I think an attractive, credible looking webpage helps enormously in user acceptance.
1. Professional vanity. 2. Personal vanity. 3. Public service. 4. Backup business idea.