> Don't use. Instead, use a precise term like platform-independent.
Oh, FFS. I've been agnostic for half of my life and I don't know a single one agnostic that would want that.
In fact, I feel more offended that it's on this novlang manual.
> Don't use. Instead, use a precise term like platform-independent.
Oh, FFS. I've been agnostic for half of my life and I don't know a single one agnostic that would want that.
In fact, I feel more offended that it's on this novlang manual.
Are they going to go through the whole dictionary to eliminate all those non-double-plus-good words that are not efficient enough?
Don't you feel that it's just getting ridiculous at this point?
I get the impression that most of the people who are complaining in the comments here are really getting worked up about some inferred political bias, rather than because they actually disagree with the substance of the style guide.
“Oh, you’re actually agnostic? Well, you still can’t say that word because another agnostic person may find it offensive.”