How exemplary that he filled in the full template questionnaire for language changes, including questions such as "Would you consider yourself a novice, intermediate, or experienced Go programmer?" (he replied "I have some experience").
> No.
Not sure why, but something about this being the (first part of the) last question he had to answer makes it quite funny to me.
Can you describe a possible implementation? (Yes.)
And the General who responds, "Right. Well done."
> What would change in the language spec?
> The new operator would get an optional second argument, and/or conversions would become addressible.
> [...]
> How would the language spec change?
> Answered above. Why is this question here twice?