You manage to generate completely nonsensical gibberish in very short sentence:
> having poor track record of intellectual theft
You are saying CCP did a poor job of stealing IP? Or you are saying CCP had done well in stealing IP?
If the latter, where is your evidence? CCP uses market coercion to force IP transfer, that's a well known practice. But where are the state sponsored IP theft?
> CCP having clear conflicts of interest with the countries Huawei is doing business with.
How so?
Obama called for G2 in [1], that's some serious recognition of the common interests between US and China. Right before Trump, you can find overwhelming official documents calling the sino us relationship being a overall positive one.
So suddenly, CCP becomes the bad guy because CCP had lots of conflicting interest?
And, for all the conflicting interests, other than the unfounded cyber security nonsense, what are the interests that huawei had a stake in?