I hate this argument. UV is also non-ionizing and it causes skin cancer without doubt.
Also, yes, there is regulation related to cell sites. Looks unnecessary, but it's there in most countries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_radiation_and_heal...
But it also seems it would be simple to test those claiming the effects in a controlled trial. ("Is the Wifi Access Point you can't see or hear transmitting now, or not?")
Does anyone know if such tests have been done and documented?
Start here, about half way down there's a good discussion and a bunch of links. Looks like they're mostly alergic to seeing the power lights.
The radio wave science specifically says:
- wifi - 2.4 GHz , ie. 5in wavelength. A well-formed conducting channel in the body of 1.25in length makes an antenna. The channel can be blood vessel, nerve connections, etc... Some voltage and current will be generated - thats just the hard science. How much of the current and voltage, how (and whether) it will be felt depends on how its all connected, its biology defining electric characteristics, etc...