Project Veritas has a history of being so wildly deceitful[1] that if they said the sky was blue, I'd want to look outside to check myself first before I believed them.
I suppose you don't want to also link to the defamation lawsuit Project Veritas recently won against The New York Times.
Concerning the actual content, I don't see how you can chalk this up to selective editing, the guy goes on for quite a while describing CNN's tactics.
What context do you think was left out?
No, that's ongoing. All they've "won" was that a judge denied a motion to dismiss the suit.
> What context do you think was left out?
I'm not going to waste time looking at the video in the first place, so don't bother asking.
Sorry, no. They've tainted the well too much to do that.
‘Project Veritas Bad’ is a becoming an increasingly myopic heuristic. Probably something better would be to think that PV is complicated, and institutions have the potential to be seriously predatory and anti-social in the broadest sense.