you think that's bad? this paper

http://pdinda.org/Papers/ipdps18.pdf

surveyed ~150 and concluded therefrom. the more hilarious thing being that they drew conclusion completely unscientifically i.e. by just interpreting vague plots (i.e. without performing t-tests or anything like that).

“But choosing good meaningful names is hard. We perform a sequence of experiments in which a total of *334 subjects* are required to choose names in given programming scenarios.”