Privacy group is preparing a case to the Irish courts over Facebook data leak
bbc.com
bbc.com
[0] https://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/2017/04/18/graph-a...
I just double checked and its set to "only me", which is what its always been. (I think I only added it because the app wanted it, but its been years since I've used the app, so don't remember)
I do hope something good (for users, not FB) comes out of it.
Literally one click and I had a list of every UK Facebook users public phone number, that's not a phone book.
There as no easy way to do a reverse lookup, but I think people are more afraid of someone finding their number from their name, not their name from their number.
The thing is, FB's protections are kind a fantasy to start with. The idea you know your friend's information but your friend's-friend's-friend's might work in real life but not on the Internet. At the same time, this fantasy is what Facebook has sold it's users (and I'd note that a look of FB user got online first with FB and so take their real life beliefs to it).
One outcome of the suit might be for FB to say "you couldn't expect real privacy from this anyway, how can we be liable" and then the judge force to FB to label it's policy "privacy protection entertainment" in the way we got World Wrestling Entertainment. And another option is for FB to pay off the suit just to avoid that happening.
-- I remember FB saying "this wasn't a hack", which is technically true. It's a manifestation of the porousness of FB's model, which is worse, at least if you expect privacy from FB.
-- Finally, lots of people say "I hate FB for not giving us privacy" where they mean the sort of pseudo-privacy around "only friends know". Here, if you accept this concept of privacy, only an entity like FB could give it to you, so cleaving to that privacy policy strengthens FB even when it's hated. It's the regulating social networks. If FB was a regulated monopoly, they'd be absolutely "too big to fail".