Why did Facebook censor the New York Post's article on BLM founder?

> Not to anyone who's studied journalism.

Last I checked journalism writes for non-journalists. Maybe we should be rethinking these snarky attitudes about who should receive public blasphemy and who shouldn't.

I wonder if that is related to why they don't want mail in ballots. You can't have an october surprise if too many have already voted.

I think what the author means is that previously, Big Tech has tried to set a more fact-agnostic tone and operated as though the ultimate responsibility for deciding whether the source was reliable rested with the reader.

There's a definite shift away from that mindset in the past (approximately) year for both Facebook and Twitter.