Hacker News Reader

Comment by stuff4ben | Hacker News Reader

you haven't been keeping up then. Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, are all state actors with significant interests in knocking the United States off its pedestal. Specifically China and its recent posturing in the South China Sea. While I agree in principle that the F35 has largely been a waste of taxpayer money, to be ignorant of military threats to our nation is not the wisest strategy.

View on HN

None of those nations are military threats to the United States in the sense that they can realistically threaten an invasion or takeover of the United States. Those nations are threats to various interests of ours and some pose economic threats to our position and interests. As the world enters into a new multi-polar reality we need to reassess our views of what a ‘threat’ is. The Pax Americana is coming to an end. Soon we as a nation will recognize that we longer have the resources to impose our will wherever we desire.

It's not only about US soil, it's also about allies like Japan, SK, Taiwan, Thailand, Philippines, Singapore. They'd all be threatened.

And why is it always described as US imposing it's will? Every Democratic govt on the planet shares mostly overlapping interests with every other Democracy. Most work together most of the time.

The Hague invasion act [0]

[0] https://www.hrw.org/news/2002/08/03/us-hague-invasion-act-be...

Pointing to one thing is lazy and does nothing to refute my claim.

Operation Gladio [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio

That sort of proves my point in that it was a plan backed by numerous friends. US goals align with most of the free world most of the time.

You seem to have it out for the US.

Perhaps you missed this sentence:

Those nations are threats to various interests of ours and some pose economic threats to our position and interests.

It’s not always described as the U.S. imposing it’s will. The U.S. seeks to impose it’s will often enough and has been successful enough that that using the hyperbole the U.S. imposing it’s will can be forgiven.

Tell me, which one of those countries realistically has the capacity to invade the United States ?

Which one is parking aircraft carriers off the coast of Florida ?

And it's vastly cheaper for these countries to impose their will via soft power. If anything making sure Americans have places to sleep will do more to ensure stability then posturing with overpriced jets.

They're not parking aircraft carriers off of Florida because we outnumber them 11 to 2. It would be pretty funny to see a single Chinese carrier parked in the Gulf, surrounded by 5 of our own though...

Military superiority is a bit like air. When you have plenty of it, it seems trivial, but without it, you're left gasping for a breath.

You know we got rid of a few of those aircraft carriers we could probably eliminate childhood poverty within 5 years or so. If you really think about it it's far easier to sow seeds of discontent in a population with so many poor. The sheer numbers of American poor, and those who feel abandoned is a security risk. They can be easily manipulated to destabilize the country.

And when I think about it I don't think America has an obligation to take care of every other country on Earth.

> You know we got rid of a few of those aircraft carriers we could probably eliminate childhood poverty within 5 years or so

Care to share your detailed plan?

> threats to our nation

Is the South China Sea already part of the US?

You meant to say : our nations economic interests.

Of course. Has it ever been any different?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com