> Probably the worst possible damage a person can do to the enviroment is to have children
Sure, let's nuke the whole world and get rid of the human species to save the environment! What a wonderful take.
Sure, let's nuke the whole world and get rid of the human species to save the environment! What a wonderful take.
Reducing the number of humans is not the same thing as extinction. Your argumentation is lacking.
Furthermore, is there any sensible, hopeful, safe, stable, productive, and generally happy society that has mass shootings and addictions/crimes of despair nearly everyday?
And the grim prediction is rather than climate change, the real problem is population growth.
Population growth is not a massive problem: we already know that human population will hit a max of 10 billion people and from there start aging progressively and reduce over time.
This is the finest kind of denialism, and it is really going to bite us hard in about a hundred years at most.
There isn't any first-world country with the number and frequencies of mass shootings or gun-related homicides the US does. 2/3 of gun deaths are suicides, which are a bigger problem of preventable acts of despair. Murder is entirely different. 54% of mass shooting are family-related. Roughly 40000 gun deaths in the US per year.
Comparing with other countries is ridiculous at best when not nonsensical. No country enables citizens to purchase weapons like in the US and no other country has hundreds of millions of weapons in circulation. Trying to make it look like a single variable problem is a joke.