Is It Pokemon or Big Data?
pixelastic.github.io
pixelastic.github.io
ROFL.
— 82736!
— Not even close.
— Yes, but very quick! (same for Big Data)
Such a good laugh.
...and if the quiz had included Pokémon from the full set of 898 in the last generation of games, I would have fared a lot worse.
And now that you mention farfetch'd, I realised it's a bug on my script... https://github.com/search?q=farfetch%27d vs https://github.com/search?q=farfetchd
I probably have to remove non-alphanumeric characters before hitting GitHub's search API...
Pokemon trivia: Ekans and Arbok are reversed Snake and Kobra.
Not to mention that it doesn’t tell you if the person knows the products or if they are just a huge Pokémon fan...
If anyone uses this as candidate assessment tool I would expect anyone with any shred of dignity to walk out.
As for filtering recruiters I think it’s a very SV centric problem and also quite a privileged problem to have. It’s funny as long as you don’t actually need a job because your rent is due.
True top talent has the luxury of usually not having to deal with recruiters in the first place and for the rest of us in the middle we know it sucks but it’s something most of us learn to deal with rather easily.
The best tech recruiters I worked with were also the ones who didn’t know anything and didn’t care, and it’s fine. I want a recruiter to be able to understand what kind of a role I want to have at a high level and what would the next challenge I want to take on, tech lead, people’s manager, building something from the ground up at a startup etc rather than try to pattern much my CV to some job posting.
The technobabble only detracts from the recruitment process I don’t care if they understand the difference between React and React Native or don’t.
[1] https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Arbok_(Pok%C3%A9mon)
Erised? Diagon? Draco? Malfoy? Nagini? Idk I always got confused haha
That was very funny. There are a lot of big data services out there with very odd names.
There are also a lot of Pokémon out there with very odd names, probably for the same reason - trying to pick an unique name.
Some discussion from before: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17660883
Publishers: "Nintendo, Game Freak, The Pokémon Company", American_Publisher: "Pokémon", Japanese_Publisher: "Pocket Monster", Chinese_Whisper: "big data". Sources: memory, Wikipedia entry.
Something is incorrect here.