A third of Covid survivors suffer neurological or mental disorders: study
reuters.com
reuters.com
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0...
Edit: Not sure maybe this should be the link ? But Reuters has nice synopsis
My country just opened a couple things and I have been talking with a lot of friends/coaches/workers. Pretty much every one of them (including myself) have these symptoms, having caught covid or not. I see people that were in general 'happy' feel depressed, run down, see little hope. I see their 'face' changes from pre covid to post covid. The people that lost their jobs.
Not wanting to be pro/against lockdowns, but I believe we will see a long effects of this for years to come.
From the news article:
> The disorders were significantly more common in COVID-19 patients than in comparison groups of people who recovered from flu or other respiratory infections over the same time period
They controlled for the world situation, lockdown and even being sick with another illness. Of course the knowledge that you have covid could be stressful in itself, but that's also a result of covid.
9 times out of 10, if the finding goes against conventional wisdom, it’s because the research was poor.
I’m saying this as a scientist who has published before.
It's not just the result of covid. It's also the result of studies like this.
There were lockdowns on Jan 20, 2020? I thought lockdown measures basically eliminated influenza diagnoses—-were the majority of control cases diagnosed before lockdown measures were implemented?
https://els-jbs-prod-cdn.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/cms/attachme...
I don't think that this is an effective control. Of course people who got the virus are during the lockdown are even more likely to have traumatic effects from the lockdown. I'm surprised it's only 80%.
I thought lockdown measures basically eliminated influenza diagnoses. Lockdown measures also occurred well after Jan 20, 2020.
What’s the temporal distribution of control cases vs. COVID cases? Were the vast majority of control cases diagnosed before lockdown measures?
No, because basic science says you control for stuff like that (no, I didn't read the full study) when computing your result.
Lockdowns may be difficult, and that's worth studying too. But they were clearly needed, and evidence like this is why. Covid is really bad.
Mental health has a stigma and often little to no coverage/help. Therefore the 1/3rd is an absolute minimum. The actual numbers are likely far significantly higher.
World Health Org is against lockdowns https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/who-official-urges-...
This is because of the mental health concerns. The problem is that politicians are not going off experts but rather covid lockdowns are political and not based in science.
It it "just" the mentally difficult situation people are in, who get infected? Or is there some neurological damage done by the virus? Maybe even permanent damage?
The elevated rates of stroke and dementia are more concerning, but are a less startling 7% and 2% respectively of the observed population. I’m not sure if the authors controlled well for confounding conditions either.
The article covers this:
>> Anxiety, at 17%, and mood disorders, at 14%, were the most common, and did not appear to be related to how mild or severe the patient’s COVID-19 infection had been.
So these disorders aren't caused by the trauma from hospitalization.
However, very little is known about why it manifests or how extensive it is. Brain autoimmunity or even just cardiovascular restriction due to inflammation can cause neurological effects.
* I am not a doctor, but had covid and have many of these symptoms
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/newsroom/news-releases/...