I'm sorry, the quality tests are garbage. Anyone who's done even a cursory amount of research into PRNGs has already heard about the Diehard tests and would have used these in preference, or as a subset, of subsequent testing.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Diehard_tests

As may be expected Diehard isn't the be-all-and-end-all of random generator testing; NIST have their own standards. Dieharder is an attempt to consolidate Diehard, NIST, and various other randomness tests.

http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/General/dieharder.php

This is a severe, severe case of "Not Invented Here"; please do research before reinventing the wheel.