For god's sake, this article engages in so much dishonest false equivalency that it's disrespectful to the notion of journalism. The author constantly interrelates skeptics of highly specific things with very reasonable questions and paranoid nutcases in a way that makes it as implicit as possible that they're in the same big basket. In other words, if you in an way question lockdowns, strict government policies or economic consequences and share these views with others on the web or in public, well then you're right in the same range as people who join together in thinking 5G networks spread COVID, or those who simply deny its existence. Mendacious, biased and unfair to many legitimate concerns over lockdowns.