Hacker News Reader

Comment by shemnon42 | Hacker News Reader

So in programmer speak

    if (!isFairUse(workUnderInvestigation) && copyrightable(originalWork)) {
      bigCopyrightPayout();
    }

Short circuit on the and operator. It's fair use, so copyrightable will not be evaluated. Evaluating copyrightable has an obervable side effect of creating a precedent.

View on HN

Yes, exactly that. Why do the && in that order? Because isFairUse(workUnderInvestigation) was a much less expensive operation than copyrightable(originalWork) for this particular value of originalWork.

That is the order scotus considered it.

Right, and that's why SCOTUS considered it in that order. Deciding API copyright was a much bigger decision than deciding fair use.

A shame, because as test cases go that wouldn’t have been a terrible one.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com